Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-jpegxs-12

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Fri, 11 June 2021 12:21 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C0F3A35C8; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 05:21:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24PQiPA7g2eb; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 05:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16D103A35C3; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 05:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [212.68.24.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49FDF60031C; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 15:21:24 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1623414084; bh=cDx/WZr317MscfvdaOrN3aFrpFUWZ9967QDCk9QBxyk=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=OMsbJggjQJJIHUNeGKxcaFhW6F3L6tCaB+ytu7Lpog+/fMxV8Zsl+EvPNkpUr49sf /2oZOkYmBx9jtqaTOyMUiPqCFKBd+wcQ6dkS6lLooZAr2pxmLf1wcgslhAz6IhiSh3 32t5C1Dxny/mmACCCFd64JQGcfbmUpRF+rUddN2g=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <1FB7AE6C-570B-46C2-8839-BE3D6C7C66D0@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2FE05CDA-8475-40F5-BB6A-4D6EF255A35F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 15:21:23 +0300
In-Reply-To: <162032334274.10241.3586337784439040714@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, avt@ietf.org, draft-ietf-payload-rtp-jpegxs.all@ietf.org
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
References: <162032334274.10241.3586337784439040714@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 49FDF60031C.A2C8D
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/UcVommYE7hB74SUtPrCGc62dMYc>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-jpegxs-12
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 12:21:42 -0000

Russ, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document.

Lars


> On 2021-5-6, at 20:49, Russ Housley via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review result: Almost Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-payload-rtp-jpegxs-12
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review Date: 2021-05-06
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-05-17
> IESG Telechat date: Unknown
> 
> 
> Summary: Almost Ready
> 
> 
> Major Concerns:
> 
> Section 7.2.1:  Does the SHALL related to [SMPTE-ST2110-10] only apply
> when TP=2110TPNL or TP=2110TPW?  Please reword to be clear when this
> SHALL statement applies.
> 
> 
> Minor Concerns:
> 
> Section 3.3:  I do not have [ISO21122-2], and obviously an implementer
> will need that document.  Can a bit more be said about "the profile"
> and "the level and sublevel used" without making this document too
> big?  I am able to get a feel for the other things listed here from
> their names.
> 
> Section 3.4:  Can you please provide some explanation of the "frat
> field"?
> 
> 
> Nits:
> 
> Section 3.2:  I do not understand the the last sentence?  Is it the
> same as: It represents sample values of a single image, without any
> interpretation relative to a colour space.
> 
> Section 5: s/of ST 2110-21 do not /of [SMPTE-ST2110-21] do not /
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art