[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04
Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 12 December 2020 15:44 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916083A11AC; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 07:44:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.23.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <160778789655.8618.14458453067077361976@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 07:44:56 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/UzzI6u2tk6rLblm1Ij6BHTFsV14>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 15:44:57 -0000
Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-?? Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date: 2020-12-12 IETF LC End Date: 2020-12-14 IESG Telechat date: 2020-12-17 Summary: The document is ready for publication with nits as a standard track RFC Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: 1. first sentence in section 3.5 "If the client loses information about a prefix that it is delegated ..." not clear "it is" 2. section 7 "This document does not add any new security considerations beyond those mentioned in Section 22 of [RFC8213]." RFC8213 does not have section 22 , did you mean of RFC8415? 3. In section 7 are there any security requirements for the operational interface requirements from section 4.4?
- [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-d… Roni Even via Datatracker
- Re: [Gen-art] [dhcwg] Genart last call review of … ianfarrer
- Re: [Gen-art] [dhcwg] Genart last call review of … Alissa Cooper