[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04

Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 12 December 2020 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916083A11AC; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 07:44:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.23.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <160778789655.8618.14458453067077361976@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 07:44:56 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/UzzI6u2tk6rLblm1Ij6BHTFsV14>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 15:44:57 -0000

Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2020-12-12
IETF LC End Date: 2020-12-14
IESG Telechat date: 2020-12-17

Summary: The document is ready for publication with nits as a standard track RFC

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
1. first sentence in section  3.5 "If the client loses information about a
prefix that it is delegated ..." not clear "it is" 2. section 7 "This document
does not add any new security considerations beyond those mentioned in Section
22 of [RFC8213]." RFC8213 does not have section 22 , did you mean of RFC8415?

3.  In section 7 are there any security requirements for the operational
interface requirements from section 4.4?