[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules-02

Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 20 July 2021 00:04 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454463A12A0; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: <gen-art@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.34.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <162673944315.11870.1471796709236350376@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:04:03 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/VBDkHUtAxl_bWFyqTL5vmlhsZMY>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:04:04 -0000

Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules-??
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review Date: 2021-07-19
IETF LC End Date: 2021-08-13
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
This document offers alternate ASN.1 modules that conform to the 2002 version
of ASN.1 for Evidence Record Syntax (ERS).

Question:
Is the Evidence Record Syntax specified in this draft going to obsolete RFC4998?

How come the AlgorithmIdentifier in this draft is slightly different from the
AlgorithmIdentifier in RFC4998?

This draft has:

AlgorithmIdentifier{}, DIGEST-ALGORITHM
  FROM AlgorithmInformation-2009 -- in [RFC5912]
     { iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
       security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0)
      id-mod-algorithmInformation-02(58) }

RFC4998 has:
AlgorithmIdentifier
    FROM PKIX1Explicit88
         { iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6)
            internet(1) security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7)
            mod(0) pkix1-explicit(18) }

RFC4998's pkix1-explicit(18) is not present in this draft. Is it intended?

Best Regards,
Linda Dunbar