IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-05

Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch> Thu, 19 January 2012 09:48 UTC

Return-Path: <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E567821F86AB; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:48:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wvv95gE4JNz4; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:48:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B65C21F8468; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:48:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93138D9307; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:48:19 +0100 (MET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on smtp.ee.ethz.ch
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.ee.ethz.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id J9MTcewnx0n0; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:48:19 +0100 (MET)
Received: from pb-10243.ethz.ch (pb-10243.ethz.ch [82.130.102.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: briant) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65B8ED9304; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:48:19 +0100 (MET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <4F170904.2000603@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:48:19 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <60243B0C-A3FF-4B51-AFF8-27C34158E02E@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
References: <4F11E975.9070307@isode.com> <10722E0B-059E-4800-84C0-B330F397B63A@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <4F16D95A.3000006@isode.com> <89E47BB4-C228-4700-94C4-3F4ED03F99A2@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <4F1704DE.1090208@isode.com> <4F170904.2000603@isode.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty@emc.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:48:21 -0000

On Jan 18, 2012, at 7:01 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> On 18/01/2012 17:43, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> Hi Brian,
>> 
>> On 18/01/2012 16:16, Brian Trammell wrote:
>>> On Jan 18, 2012, at 3:38 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>>> 
>>> Actually, since the binding between RID and a PKI is better defined in rfc6045-bis, 6046-bis now refers to it, as follows:
>>> 
>>>    Each RID system SHOULD authenticate its peers via a PKI as detailed
>>>    in Section 9.3 of [I-D.ietf-mile-rfc6045-bis].
>>> 
>>> Would this address the concern?
>> Let me check.
> 
> So the text in rfc6045bis seems to suggest that all server certificates will be verified based on some prior arrangement. Is my understanding correct?

Yes; in essence, a RID consortium is "closed".

Cheers,

Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email