Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-17

Linda, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document.

Lars

> On Aug 10, 2023, at 21:18, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Not Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-17
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review Date: 2023-08-10
> IETF LC End Date: 2023-08-09
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:
> 
> The document specifies a method to parse the JSON objects to get values and
> specifies the syntax to retrieve a list of values. The document reads well.
> However, like any software programs, errors can be encountered at run time even
> after careful review.
> 
> Major issues:
> The major issue is that this document should not be “Standard Track” because:
> 1.      Existing parsers for JSON data don’t need to change to comply with the
> syntax specified in this document. 2.      Like SQL, this document specified
> syntax may change as more ways being developed by implementers to parse the
> JSON objects. 3.      It is not clear why IANA registration is needed.
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> Thanks, Linda Dunbar
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-17

Attachment: signature.asc