Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Wed, 16 December 2015 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701781B2D4C; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 04:48:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NQChjo8BcZ-x; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 04:48:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [204.178.8.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1DC1B2D41; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 04:48:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-azure.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.18]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916CD123134; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 07:48:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njfpsrvexg11.research.att.com [135.207.255.123]) by mail-azure.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62524E0519; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 07:48:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com ([fe80::108a:1006:9f54:fd90]) by NJFPSRVEXG11.research.att.com ([fe80::516e:6eec:2697:ec78%17]) with mapi; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 07:48:09 -0500
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive.all@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 07:48:07 -0500
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04
Thread-Index: AdE3oy0TnlyGAk8HQxe2upc6QNwFAQAXJU9A
Message-ID: <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D1D9E9E3F48@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
References: <5670C1B7.6010003@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5670C1B7.6010003@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/VTwHKdaCsfNJbPOctU1Wi4dkGFw>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:48:17 -0000

Thanks for your review, Brian.  I propose:

   We note that [I-D.chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework] proposes
   a method similar to [I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m], as ippm-list discussion
   revealed.

hope that does it,
Al

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:43 PM
> To: draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive.all@ietf.org; General Area Review
> Team
> Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04.txt
> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
> Review Date: 2015-12-16
> IETF LC End Date: 2015-12-24
> IESG Telechat date:
> 
> Summary: Almost ready
> --------
> 
> Minor Issue:
> ------------
> 
>    We note that [I-D.chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework] proposes
>    a method similar to [I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m], and ippm-list discussion
>    indicates [I-D.chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework] may be
>    covered by the same IPR as [I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m].
> 
> I suggest removing the IPR comment. It may be an issue, but not for this
> draft. We generally avoid taking a position on IPR applicablity (in
> fact,
> our lawyer tells us not to do so).