Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-mobility-03

[Pete Resnick <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the response Tiru. Trimming down to the one open issue below; 
everything else looks perfect:

On 8 Aug 2016, at 23:50, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) wrote:

>> 3.1.2 - Change "MUST" to "will" both times in the second paragraph.

I presume you're OK with those changes?

>> The last sentence of the section I don't understand; it doesn't seem 
>> to have any interoperability implications, and I don't see why the 
>> client can't examine the ticket in any way it wants. Either justify 
>> the sentence or delete it.
>
> [TR] Even if the client examines the ticket there is no guarantee that 
> it will be able decode its fields. This line is added to suggest that 
> there is no need for the client to examine the ticket.

Well, "no need" is very different than "MUST NOT". If you really want to 
keep the sentence (and I still think you could just delete it), I would 
suggest simply changing it to something like: "Note: There is no 
guarantee that the fields in the ticket are going to be decodable to a 
client, and therefore attempts by a client to examine the ticket are 
unlikely to be useful."

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - [phone]