Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-mv1-msns-update-04

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 07 March 2019 03:57 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B64B130E57; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 19:57:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=VNMSVzZE; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=lh3/EppI
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XGndnFNZq9Zt; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 19:57:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39A1D128CF2; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 19:57:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4189A21FD3; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 22:57:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 Mar 2019 22:57:23 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=a 627PlMf3e03L+k6VHCEJcukKF6HaoWT2gK1FGCkXeY=; b=VNMSVzZE09SXs+9cK i0Uwz1G8FW6t3JrfshkWxvqQ52j/si544KYJiSqvaCSPOBgcRAoE4JnJpNJFV+v2 ucQTLc/7PhEZQ568LK965MhnKlEuc3NYN3LgYNLvFOXtLw8xeDVoNr6b3l68u4E9 8Z85KE4Hqjlu4+v5zduoLaZWNQiPqo+FLn4SXzpP9x5Yje6w+QCamYQjqAL2ikwL aHbcF3heEwHElsE3P1AJ6DOjGqLGKr1kB4ZTVxHQn/FuXowAXh/O1+1EQVLXUHZ6 5ej68OPO+GPheT+1aqSRpsTlYYo/HVD5ZHYXNFmUbAfr69EATNgksgasdwi+TVLb LcXnw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=a627PlMf3e03L+k6VHCEJcukKF6HaoWT2gK1FGCkX eY=; b=lh3/EppIiW6H60UKfWbJ3UOjn1A5CMUkClUzPcnV2odKy2v5H4dB8Ss85 PonWGZayoCatrtyGZ2s8v4+yk+/71EsRbPeyBSCuL0EJ6g4nZqLjD0ht6haJ2yXh 47vyOtd7+zjYPD7c4obryaQVPCdyu9sVTLYKwtn7DUBhA97GrTBp0d56yuYTKk3e n1Flw/0RDd8XQ33A8X1EAEacbcy50DVzAz+n527UPnM9ewuU2IRQVSmX6f7G8hyh 6v+rZNkskMmmdp+YuYK7+dWVIthO07GWKp6W+hlQbfpT/YlDMknGfPxKlosRrCtD 6Wcz+CVgeH43DHCA4zkwp0ZOFePKw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:opaAXLA6Bl95vRxaMbj3VeqUJyiIzN4XancBTGekdFmLGq09-8ksog>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrfeejgdeiiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhs rgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuffhomhgrih hnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepudejfedrfeekrdduudejrdejgeenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinhenucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:opaAXIjdzyuUtjjkxUUBmRmeyfj22WKmYr7NHZ9Dncsd4dTyg7IG_Q> <xmx:opaAXLmQ0_-VhZ2z13nawPPUbzxK_zH7V0uJFCe5QOG7dmudMhlWZQ> <xmx:opaAXMrixrJ_K1r4DJxbMgtiowr5eMe5MSyaqGD_p2E0f-KspdAPWw> <xmx:o5aAXGLPmPoOnzENy_j891ni1aUZ-PTVjYJD-HHFhUeWQp8eBIVPyA>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro5.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.74]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 66779E465D; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 22:57:22 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <155113717232.10637.7525373641441458464@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 22:57:20 -0500
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, nfsv4@ietf.org, draft-ietf-nfsv4-mv1-msns-update.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6B58AD72-A23D-487B-A8B3-0B06885C0398@cooperw.in>
References: <155113717232.10637.7525373641441458464@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/VuoM_H-nrDIoOfYTkDLntFuxovQ>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-mv1-msns-update-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 03:57:29 -0000

Brian, thanks for your review. I entered an Abstain ballot since I don’t think the approach taken with this update is a pattern we want to follow for IETF specifications.

Alissa

> On Feb 25, 2019, at 6:26 PM, Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
> Review result: Ready
> 
> Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-mv1-msns-update-04
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-nfsv4-mv1-msns-update-04.txt
> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
> Review Date: 2019-02-26
> IETF LC End Date: 2019-02-19
> IESG Telechat date: 2019-03-07
> 
> Summary: Ready
> --------
> 
> Comments: 
> ---------
> 
> I was assigned this review very late, so I have not had time to
> review any technical details.
> 
> This document is a very major patch to be applied to RFC5661.
> It is apparently very carefully written with full details of which
> text in 5661 is changed, but even checking that aspect for correctness
> would be a major task, which I did not attempt. To be precise, it's
> a 106 page patch to a 617 page document. I assume that the WG made
> a conscious decision to do this rather than attempt RFC5661bis.
> 
> I was a little disappointed not to see an Implementation Status
> section per BCP205. The writeup says "This document was a result
> of implementation and deployment experience" but it would increase
> this reviewer's confidence level if there were a few more details.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art