IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam-01

Tore Anderson <tore@redpill-linpro.com> Thu, 15 October 2015 08:26 UTC

Return-Path: <tore@redpill-linpro.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A13D1A907A for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 01:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rurGlXr_YAZK for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 01:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gallus.zimbra.h.bitbit.net (gallus.zimbra.h.bitbit.net [87.238.49.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD0CD1A9079 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 01:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gallus.zimbra.h.bitbit.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49771C1184; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:26:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gallus.zimbra.h.bitbit.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gallus.zimbra.h.bitbit.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id jCUe9Nf3rSFf; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:26:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gallus.zimbra.h.bitbit.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803E9C128B; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:26:48 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gallus.zimbra.h.bitbit.net
Received: from gallus.zimbra.h.bitbit.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gallus.zimbra.h.bitbit.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id if-GYbh0Mb78; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:26:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from envy.fud.no (cm-84.209.100.219.getinternet.no [84.209.100.219]) by gallus.zimbra.h.bitbit.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51AD6C1184; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:26:48 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:26:47 +0200
From: Tore Anderson <tore@redpill-linpro.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Message-ID: <20151015102647.0a4baf7a@envy.fud.no>
In-Reply-To: <6A6AFAB0-A92F-432B-8764-E01773205F33@piuha.net>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5CB28AAF@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <20151007124411.2e943953@echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com> <6A6AFAB0-A92F-432B-8764-E01773205F33@piuha.net>
Organization: Redpill Linpro
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/VzAnmiQb0I-UTUlaGH4Asl0kRLQ>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:26:52 -0000

* Jari Arkko

> >    When translating a packet between IPv4 and IPv6, an SIIT
> >    implementation MUST individually translate each IP address it
> >    encounters in the packet's IP headers (including any IP headers
> >    contained within ICMP errors) according to Section 3.3, except for
> >    any address for which Section 4 explicitly states that the EAM
> >    algorithm MUST NOT be used.
> 
> I think this makes sense, and I at least feel this is better text
> than the original. Thanks.

Hello Jari,

My co-author felt the above was a bit too "conjunction-overflowy", so
we ended up with the following:

   Unless otherwise specified in Section 4, an SIIT implementation MUST
   individually translate each IP address it encounters in the packet's
   IP headers (including any IP headers contained within ICMP errors)
   according to Section 3.3.

This is in draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam-02. I hope you see this too as an
improvement over the original?

Tore

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email