Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08

<> Mon, 29 August 2016 07:19 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F7D127071; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.768
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jgc46Huxr8yH; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4A3412D095; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 29 Aug 2016 09:19:52 +0200
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,595,1464645600"; d="scan'208";a="949678563"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Aug 2016 09:19:44 +0200
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 09:19:42 +0200
Received: from ([fe80::8954:80af:2020:572c]) by ([fe80::8954:80af:2020:572c%27]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 09:19:42 +0200
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08
Thread-Index: AQHSAbBqwFhwz1J/LECeSUfg7Gg6Y6Bfh0wQ
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 07:19:42 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 07:19:57 -0000

Hi Brian,

thanks. I've submitted a new version without the nits (I applied "RFC nnnn" notation for non-reference mentions).



The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

There's also a htmlized version available at:

A diff from the previous version is available at:

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Brian E Carpenter [] 
Gesendet: Montag, 29. August 2016 06:47
An:; General Area Review Team
Betreff: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at <>.

Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2016-08-29
IETF LC End Date: 2016-09-08
IESG Telechat date:

Summary: Ready with nits


1. I was co-chair of the original diffserv WG, and I have tracked this draft throughout its life and influenced some of its content. I have re-read it carefully for this review.

2. I believe it is correctly positioned as Informational. It might become a candidate for BCP with deployment experience.


Section 4 mentions RFC2575, certainly a typo for RFC2475.

Non-reference mentions of RFCs are inconsistent, e.g. both "RFC4594" and  "RFC 4594" occur.