IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-11.txt

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Thu, 22 October 2015 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3E61B42B7; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8hKg1osZ0Uzb; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0106.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7979F1B4290; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.72.140) by CO1PR05MB460.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.72.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.306.13; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:35:31 +0000
Received: from CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.16.52]) by CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.16.52]) with mapi id 15.01.0306.003; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:35:31 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-11.txt
Thread-Index: AdELtl+eJE9RAChQS5ST9srU/eqc3gAV51uAAC8U9IAACW68AA==
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:35:31 +0000
Message-ID: <A0AA75A5-A1A1-44E6-B56A-46878CD968DB@juniper.net>
References: <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF63A9CBB85@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <EA8A3C59-DD4F-403A-9A8F-1A16B5DEF471@juniper.net> <FC47DBF9-F854-4D45-B1C6-D3851192306E@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <FC47DBF9-F854-4D45-B1C6-D3851192306E@piuha.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.151008
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kwatsen@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CO1PR05MB460; 5:G34AM9IdlMrQQmRe+TzImtuO6pJtyyJkTyzeh+A4rp0Cnsj3ZpPQ5f//5mxSHqNjAzJAijQbyf2jBdzulBnE5Pp03ZgmA578ABfb8ymX3Lzcx3YCK1KoCFB9Ja4DtAooR4KVWD2qNZ060XhuSU+O2w==; 24:hFxiRtEQJw4Bq7jDC2TZ5iYHfPygCJ7ufAGPSICM95nqaKllcSN/OwKYBIJsdfJ3rLURT9Ypoek9hjF1BqL0bHiCwFdFfVQzgMLekGMThmQ=; 20:ZXtO4JokAOCOhHhFUFopVg9j/UhaF2WSdaAbJFMq3zkark8FWpiaL+kJuxjAbHzrrmumZDDT+mn9rBq7U3op8A==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO1PR05MB460;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO1PR05MB46017882A981B252FE81137A5270@CO1PR05MB460.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(138986009662008)(37575265505322);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(520078)(5005006)(3002001)(102215026); SRVR:CO1PR05MB460; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO1PR05MB460;
x-forefront-prvs: 0737B96801
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(979002)(6009001)(199003)(189002)(51914003)(24454002)(43784003)(479174004)(164054003)(377454003)(82746002)(19580405001)(87936001)(122556002)(19580395003)(33656002)(83506001)(40100003)(83716003)(189998001)(5001960100002)(110136002)(105586002)(54356999)(50986999)(99286002)(101416001)(106356001)(76176999)(4001350100001)(5004730100002)(5007970100001)(97736004)(81156007)(66066001)(5002640100001)(11100500001)(2900100001)(102836002)(2950100001)(92566002)(15975445007)(5008740100001)(86362001)(36756003)(10400500002)(230783001)(104396002)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR05MB460; H:CO1PR05MB458.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <6B807CE4C3B337489ECD94FC0B56EDDC@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Oct 2015 21:35:31.4729 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1PR05MB460
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/WeMhkoOb90a4FWKoQYZnb-b6W4g>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netconf-call-home.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netconf-call-home.all@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-11.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:37:08 -0000

Hi Jari, Suresh,

Thank you for your suggestion.  How about this, after each of the four uses of “must immediately start” (in C3, C8, S3, and S6), we add the sentence:

    It is unnecessary for the <protocol> [client/server] to wait
    for the remote peer to initiate the <protocol> first.

Would this be helpful?

Thanks,
Kent





On 10/22/15, 9:05 AM, "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:

>Thanks for the explanation, Kent, and for the review, Suresh. Can the explanation be added to the document for other people who might have the same question.
>
>Jari
>
>On 21 Oct 2015, at 19:37, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:
>
>> 
>> Hi Suresh,
>> 
>> Thank you for your review.
>> 
>> To answer your question, the server can start the SSH server protocol immediately.  It does not have the wait for the client for anything.  At least, this is how my code works  :)
>> 
>> Thanks again,
>> Kent
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 10/21/15, 12:10 AM, "Suresh Krishnan" <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
>>> 
>>> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before
>>> posting a new version of the draft.
>>> 
>>> Document: draft-ietf-netconf-call-home-11.txt
>>> Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
>>> Review Date: 2015/10/20
>>> IESG Telechat date: 2015/10/22
>>> 
>>> Summary: The draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but I do
>>> have a comment that you may wish to address.
>>> 
>>> Minor
>>> =====
>>> 
>>> * Section 3.1 S3: The server cannot immediately start the SSH server protocol
>>> without waiting for SSH connection initiation from the SSH client, right? If
>>> yes, shouldn't there be an additional condition here?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> Suresh
>>> 
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gen-art mailing list
>> Gen-art@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status