IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04

"Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net> Mon, 24 February 2020 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0D83A0E3C; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:04:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=e6b0YVyC; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=hD3frSuT
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QEWwGD7UCSi6; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:04:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B48B63A0E52; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:04:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7702621B03; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:04:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:04:50 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=wO6OcHvu4gYwU7Z3+4kY9qGp/txT dJlvypJ/jaYlZdo=; b=e6b0YVyCjS1KVct2AZBch6WfQjOvODsQRTV6SAYBN5Gv sL6FkDvcW1rYhobPLYq0qvIhUKY2BENVPhtFiETQDjtI38OVpTj3bJx5OmKfpu6T cXCsZztC4eeAGPlo4KEsrvRxPT0f3+kzNrAhCz9INyDi4P+l5FCPnmkJ4HnfYAZU FskgCislnwyODk0iK03TVWEtF1hfgfCWeR4MzrubX6oowB+AeSdQkEFH8sXFM4oI goqYT3cy5nEKuWgn8S3MRdv4qgeVXEIP+beo2e0j2cjpgvX+ICSJokl2GMZN6/De TqXBjBW+SUl2hkslyBIYfdMxo8QS5zZ/YcJTbg1yvg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=wO6OcH vu4gYwU7Z3+4kY9qGp/txTdJlvypJ/jaYlZdo=; b=hD3frSuTl0ICCz9j63COHr kiLclbxnr6igPNXOhcWSO2/7HY6McVLq5Dx+pFrwQSz21JkdJjN2cn+TEEHvXkwK Ami7ZgRtQ81DeUk35fLDbXl2BZdXaTPss/kzbwfz9rCzT/HUJZGK84RkA2PqgJco cME9WeuJE5eGoEW3YxFBHEbxoaPKERV62+viER4ingvSuDzxxjUFedk2ce5tDkbd JZQ8NgOyQ8Dmhyo0/wbvcwG2geumE5bV0VnEKBSRm+x8/JNj3u/ODIyQRooASeFK cldczK5Jl+FVDkSPQd8lLhbtdxVNC3L1Z9n6i5BgBtpHEELSjOqAFFJwF1x0LbeA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:IfRTXuscP702yV0E92kVuGthy8RyElJT5Ab1_tWOhoqoU0d-failkA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrledtgdekgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhht ihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenucevlh hushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigv nhhtrhhophihrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:IfRTXplcs0aE3-DRHNqDWnNSEMqWbJMXXtFKl_jMD42HEDgPwsDSIQ> <xmx:IfRTXscz90TI6ZpMV6tG6aNxwxKZs0pflTzy5mxFvqNyDdaqrzEBJA> <xmx:IfRTXnDklBOnsOW4y9sh3OGG63-iOOEjSQWfMDTEtMUAUuedtoSs1g> <xmx:IvRTXtvK_8S_3sR_YVR3CkKkHffTOEGITSIAZDCTOPyHssVaEgFO-w>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 20304E00A6; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:04:49 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-947-gbed3ff6-fmstable-20200220v2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a7c7fc6c-1a07-4a68-9c03-44eebcb31f2b@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <158250611906.1067.14505081937854561120@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <158250611906.1067.14505081937854561120@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:04:09 -0800
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: ietf-and-github@ietf.org, draft-ietf-git-using-github.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/X-aL3ZzsDGN-izSVq49Dmt5AXu4>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:04:58 -0000

Thanks Brian,

On Sun, Feb 23, 2020, at 17:01, Brian Carpenter via Datatracker wrote:
> Is this draft intended to become part of BCP25? I think it would be
> useful for the IESG to clarify this rather than leave it to the RFC Editor.

This is a good question.  Given the intended status of BCP, I would say that integrating into 25 is better than creating a new number.  I don't know how to best signal this intent though.

And I fixed the nit in the copy on GitHub.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email