[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-09
Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 12 August 2022 19:50 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E07C157B52; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 12:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo.all@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.13.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <166033385333.7724.14555622442470360665@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 12:50:53 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/XdX6DQcSJviepiZBVDd2WehpoW8>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 19:50:53 -0000
Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-?? Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: 2022-08-12 IETF LC End Date: 2022-08-17 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Draft is ready with nits for a Proposed Standard. Major issues: 0 Minor issues: 1 (please see below) Nits/editorial comments: 4 (please see below) Minor: - Sec. 3.6: Note that Type is "TBD" here. Should this be 1046, as shown in Table 1? (Or is the use of 1046 still under discussion?) Nits: - I note that certain acronyms --- IGP, NLRI, ASLA --- are not defined. I suspect that these are well-known in the community, hence need no definition. Just in case they are not, you may consider expanding the rare ones on first use. - Sec. 1: s/Flexible algorithm is called so as/Flexible algorithm is so called because/ - Sec. 2: s/Definition(s) (FAD) advertised by a node is/Definition(s) (FAD) advertised by a node is (are)/ Reason: symmetry in the sentence construction - Sec. 3.6: Is Figure 7 missing the trailing "//" for sub-TLV tpes? Thanks.
- [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i… Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Vijay Gurbani
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Vijay Gurbani
- Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review… Lars Eggert