IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-04

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com> Wed, 23 May 2018 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <acm@research.att.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB872126E64; Wed, 23 May 2018 06:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yIRGLL0cQ4Lk; Wed, 23 May 2018 06:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21AD4126D85; Wed, 23 May 2018 06:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0053301.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w4NDZCk9044742; Wed, 23 May 2018 09:39:29 -0400
Received: from tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (sbcsmtp3.sbc.com [144.160.112.28]) by mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2j56h3djks-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 23 May 2018 09:39:29 -0400
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w4NDdRT0027029; Wed, 23 May 2018 08:39:28 -0500
Received: from zlp30499.vci.att.com (zlp30499.vci.att.com [135.46.181.149]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w4NDdNAZ026945; Wed, 23 May 2018 08:39:23 -0500
Received: from zlp30499.vci.att.com (zlp30499.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30499.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 81B464000751; Wed, 23 May 2018 13:39:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (unknown [135.41.1.46]) by zlp30499.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 63C7B4000744; Wed, 23 May 2018 13:39:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sldc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w4NDdMka016489; Wed, 23 May 2018 08:39:23 -0500
Received: from mail-azure.research.att.com (mail-azure.research.att.com [135.207.255.18]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w4NDdH0D016070; Wed, 23 May 2018 08:39:17 -0500
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njmtcas2.research.att.com [135.207.255.47]) by mail-azure.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86BBE1022; Wed, 23 May 2018 09:39:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njmtexg4.research.att.com ([fe80::8cd:baa3:219e:5bd4]) by njmtcas2.research.att.com ([fe80::d550:ec84:f872:cad9%15]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Wed, 23 May 2018 09:39:07 -0400
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>
To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
CC: "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-04
Thread-Index: AQHT2vAXJ7QhBzk6CU6+ArpFcLOf66QR+ngAgAKJsQCAKPuuwA==
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 13:39:16 +0000
Message-ID: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF4A91FF72@njmtexg4.research.att.com>
References: <152448027744.5388.467690097024295297@ietfa.amsl.com> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF4A8EE72E@njmtexg5.research.att.com> <AMSPR07MB344BD1CAD8FF6AD6AB10A3B988D0@AMSPR07MB344.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AMSPR07MB344BD1CAD8FF6AD6AB10A3B988D0@AMSPR07MB344.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [74.74.232.194]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-05-23_05:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1805230139
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Yj-Y52df92u_rTlBq7vB0kFKd3k>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 13:39:34 -0000

Hi Francesca,
one last item to resolve, we should be good now.
see below,
Al

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francesca Palombini [mailto:francesca.palombini@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2018 3:44 AM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acm@research.att.com>; gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: ippm@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6.all@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-04
> 
> Hi Al,
> 
> Thanks for your reply.
> I cut selected parts of the email to detail some of my comments, see
> inline.
> 
> Francesca
> 
...snip...
> > > To be consistent with the first bullet of the list above ("It includes
> > > a valid IP header: see below for version-specific criteria."), I would
> > > rephrase the text above with something on the lines of:
> > >
> > > "For an IPvX (...) packet to be standard-formed, the IPvX-specific
> > > criteria for a valid IP header are:"
> > [acm]
> > Your wording suggestion dropped the clear indication of a requirement.
> > We are using the RFC2119 terms consistently for requirements.
> >
> 
> I was trying to point out that the first part of the section (first bullet
> list) does not use RFC2119 terms. I read the second bullet list as a "sub-
> list" of the first one, which is why I was suggesting removing the
> REQUIRED term. Or you could rephrase the first list to use REQUIRED too.
> Anyway, this is nit-picking. Feel free to disregard.
> 
[acm]
I see your point now, and I changed the sentence introducing the 
initial (IP version-agnostic list) to read:

A packet is standard-formed if it meets all of the following REQUIRED criteria:

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email