IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-02

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Mon, 18 January 2016 11:55 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC631B35B1 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 03:55:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q6nvz7MbcbY3 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 03:55:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D92B1B356E for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 03:55:11 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2AACQAv0pxW/yYyC4coLQkZAQEBAQ8BAQEBgj4hKyIwbQaFM4Mdsz8BDYFaCRgBCIVuAoEvOBQBAQEBAQEBgQoJBQEBgg6CGAEBAxIbTBIBFQcOViYBBA4NGod5AQ2jbppWAQEBAQEBBAEBAQEBAQEBARqGV4kqKiANEYIlDEEbgRsFkxOEBwGFR4J0hwFKg3qDH4VAhW+IbiABAUKBYDIcgV1yAQEBhjEBgQcBAQE
X-IPAS-Result: A2AACQAv0pxW/yYyC4coLQkZAQEBAQ8BAQEBgj4hKyIwbQaFM4Mdsz8BDYFaCRgBCIVuAoEvOBQBAQEBAQEBgQoJBQEBgg6CGAEBAxIbTBIBFQcOViYBBA4NGod5AQ2jbppWAQEBAQEBBAEBAQEBAQEBARqGV4kqKiANEYIlDEEbgRsFkxOEBwGFR4J0hwFKg3qDH4VAhW+IbiABAUKBYDIcgV1yAQEBhjEBgQcBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,312,1449550800"; d="scan'208,217";a="162049544"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast-smtpauth.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.38]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 18 Jan 2016 06:55:09 -0500
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC03.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.13]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 18 Jan 2016 06:54:55 -0500
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC03.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.13]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 06:54:53 -0500
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-02
Thread-Index: AdFR5wSJQVgOuJ3NTYG2aAj+zT1Yuw==
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:54:52 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEEB64A@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.48]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEEB64AAZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/YpOyRgKM9xyevG2_IbcV4uQbaEA>
Cc: "draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:55:13 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area

Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed

by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just

like any other last call comments.



For more information, please see the FAQ at



http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__wiki.tools.ietf.org_area_gen_trac_wiki_GenArtfaq&d=BQMFAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=kNe-fJnoS_Eagzztuod4LVFw7OJ6s-ih-o2YM-xvFP4&s=7q6lQBnAbR4BsEU2p-U-LXSTbFz8uppNP68d4Ysxjiw&e=>



Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-02.txt

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu

Review Date: 1/18/16

IETF LC End Date: 1/18/16

IESG Telechat date: (if known):



Summary:



Ready.



This document is an update that fixes a problem with RFC 7360 where MODULE-IDENTITY was defined as { snmpModules 235 } rather than { mib-2 235 } as advised by the MIB Doctors and recommended by IANA. The rest of the content is identical with RFC 7360.





Major issues:



There is a process issue that the IESG, IANA and the RFC Editor should check (maybe they already did it) in order to avoid such situations in the future. Is IANA involved in AUTH 48 last review of the document? If they are not, maybe they should be. In this case the MIB Doctors recommendation was implemented by IANA in the registry, but the content of the document was not fixed, and nobody at AUTH 48 discovered the problem.



Minor issues:



Nits/editorial comments:

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email