Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 23 January 2012 23:54 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E314821F8693 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:54:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vLzOo8y34MDS for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:54:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD4E21F85EE for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:54:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-124.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.124]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A61614005B; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:04:07 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4F1DF332.1080901@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:54:26 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnUz-k3=WKhRedc0MPr0EoGz+NWBKNi=qGh0RdoK6tG2Kw@mail.gmail.com> <CADBvc9-m1em1=3i78B+VKUc96VK3jMwzHZpuT2WcFUCysv2Shg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnU2NoLLRkMNo8+CaOWL_f=oE2T4i-uZdG5utJvCY9+WjA@mail.gmail.com> <4F16EFCA.2000808@stpeter.im> <CABkgnnXPv0xF8E4Xo-XZe82G8y76Vx9SK+_9VNDzghSJSvdcsg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXPv0xF8E4Xo-XZe82G8y76Vx9SK+_9VNDzghSJSvdcsg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>, draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:54:29 -0000
On 1/23/12 4:52 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > Hi Peter, > > -02 is a marked improvement over the version I reviewed. All my > concerns were addressed. > > --Martin > > On Jan 18, 2012 8:14 AM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter@stpeter.im > <mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im>> wrote: >> >> Martin, here is my perspective... >> >> On 12/17/11 ?:46 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: >> > "It is easy" is not an especially good reason. >> >> Martin, is there *harm* in completing these registrations via >> informational RFCs? > > I don't find that reason any more compelling. How about: "this is the > one we chose and there isn't a good reason to choose either, so this > will do"? Which is probably what you meant anyhow... How about: "everyone else was doing it that way so the author didn't see a good reason to buck the trend"?
- [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-disc… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-… Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-… Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-… Peter Saint-Andre