Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-dots-architecture-16

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 05 February 2020 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C168D120147; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 12:05:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=pvKFuMnR; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=fRZStO7g
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8RzLxzJpsNaJ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 12:05:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF3D2120100; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 12:05:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3630122054; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 15:05:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 05 Feb 2020 15:05:43 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=z XMmoGp0pVkzpJ7yv/UQY6F//F7zoXMVozMLp9/qh1s=; b=pvKFuMnRolEJjroiw s3e5S8Uzbn/6CWE/McDVJkK4rNzuGtijK5qdOEfpTlsr9zaAg9piVU5RSDOgVRlE ogU4xw5VQpa+8pUNg9fA+82VGBzzV3r+mEyMyQK3hLMFDBVxAlpd/YxmW51wksLt ppXMUGlujs0DX9SzecX/LZXVXC+JlLHgBCjjzocJPOI8bGXstAfx0EGNoJ02fY32 2fwEwE0sgrl4zWFdAGrnuoOJVpDlf9g0SPqOAgriBp5It+F1viln7UJzXqTI7tu8 ObvAp0QWdAYzrJaaE6GQypC/vkVJvZIJguiXVzBLWKsRTYFfjTK3Gk7ngy9nu/Ab ofSrA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=zXMmoGp0pVkzpJ7yv/UQY6F//F7zoXMVozMLp9/qh 1s=; b=fRZStO7gM6XmuJHN8Bgih59GG75Fl7Bp/7fp6Wg9jrKJUx6ReFdKOsjk7 5Fz4lRaKBu7dIFXXmpg2q4/85qDaz8RvgZECNl0nFwig984W27AUqcYL4tVGlaz+ 03Lhv/+JZVIopGN8YKBMryjTzKfqU4bebs3plPn+8uZ9ZctXIghdEejvXQRealS9 rnlS6UhutsYXcyDw2caGvD+HHPzbs7IhuxadDXwMacXlFED58mYWhcMpA30sHLVz oAksbL02IAJnaQ9g8cBdLVjwJ3lJTBRBiWtSZyu+UimOxPRvaiK22ISKneODWAyc gdfxNDKleo2UCz3jCXbJKodgCj9QA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:FyA7XpD8itNZQ8VM2KLMPqYGZvFYsTYJ0CeBklF-UthCwxHYw01Uyg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrhedugdduvdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtjeenucfhrhhomheptehlihhs shgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucffohhmrg hinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedujeefrdefkedruddujedrkedvnecuvehluhhs thgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtoh hophgvrhifrdhinh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:FyA7XhgHwBpOs7bwYPaPHW8JjBVgZef17HggdJnaChaOZMzg7zNl7Q> <xmx:FyA7XrMjgWyw2HPWD1LkUZcsOg8Vz7pP7wrNkzNfcydVTvErYdwYgQ> <xmx:FyA7Xh8DyzxWA7AOjeKnN64LCnQRzN9f6D_LIt0O0pRmCOYcL3aYuw> <xmx:FyA7XiImUcxU1G3usBUbxOFXcp_8OwUqjfOBGO__vUfMSV8I6ZacRQ>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.82]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C29AF3280060; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 15:05:42 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <24980c1c-bcb7-521b-cbc7-4a92456eaccb@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 15:05:42 -0500
Cc: draft-ietf-dots-architecture.all@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DAAF65AE-71DE-4E48-93CA-90D5A0FF5332@cooperw.in>
References: <24980c1c-bcb7-521b-cbc7-4a92456eaccb@alum.mit.edu>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/ZFvjIzzb4x6-b80L88tpl9OvSrg>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-dots-architecture-16
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 20:05:46 -0000

Paul, thanks for your reviews. Tiru, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Jan 31, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <​http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-dots-architecture-16
> Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat
> Review Date: 2020-01-31
> IETF LC End Date: 2019-01-31
> IESG Telechat date: 2020-02-04
> 
> This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication.
> 
> Thank you for fixing the issues I reported in the last call review. Only one nit remains. IdNits reports:
> 
> == The document seems to lack the recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate, even if it appears to use RFC 2119 keywords -- however, there's a paragraph with a matching beginning. Boilerplate error? (The document does seem to have the reference to RFC 2119 which the ID-Checklist requires).
> 
> There is one other reported nit (obsolete reference). It is bogus because it is intended.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art