Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-reschke-http-status-308-05

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Fri, 16 March 2012 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC45A21E8024; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yVI693p48kio; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E6921E800C; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frankenstein.test.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2GL7rXL010759 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:07:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F6218DA.6080003@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:07:53 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DC053E5E-FC55-4725-86F3-9FAF1882C424@nostrum.com>
References: <27FD8C7A-7636-4D60-A65E-C2B264857A0E@nostrum.com> <4F5E2F65.1000706@gmx.de> <4F6218DA.6080003@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "gen-art@ietf.org Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>, IESG IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-reschke-http-status-308.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-reschke-http-status-308-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:07:58 -0000

On Mar 15, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> Hi Ben,
> 
> Do Julian's comments or the changes in version 06 address your concerns?
> 
> Peter

Apologies for the late response. Please see my separate response to Julian. But also keep in mind that I don't think any of these items necessarily need to be showstoppers for an _experimental_ RFC.

Thanks!

Ben.