Re: [Gen-art] GenART LC review of draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-03
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 03 December 2015 13:47 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150D41A87AF for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 05:47:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bIqkg0h16Ooh for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 05:47:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5132F1A87A0 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 05:47:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BAD2CC5D; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:47:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aIYJ7E7GaRVh; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:47:44 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061E52CC5C; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:47:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F5B5DDB5-5EB9-43DC-87C7-2C4DF1775B6C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0CB51F9D@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 15:47:45 +0200
Message-Id: <A9648059-7713-43A0-8D9A-2AB43500743F@piuha.net>
References: <010801d126ae$dc37e270$94a7a750$@gmail.com> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0CB51F9D@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
To: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/_7MbwzhsnUYj9Z02UJU5AVT4uhk>
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] GenART LC review of draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 13:47:47 -0000
Xiahu & roni: Thank you both of you. Jari On 24 Nov 2015, at 14:16, Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com> wrote: > Hi Roni, > > > > Thanks for your review. I will fix the editorial error in the next revision. > > > > Best regards, > > Xiaohu > > From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 7:54 PM > To: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet.all@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: ietf@ietf.org > Subject: GenART LC review of draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-03 > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-03 > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date:2015–11-23 > IETF LC End Date: 2015–11-24 > IESG Telechat date: > > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. > > > Major issues: > > > Minor issues: > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > Typo in the title of 3.8 “ARP/ND and Unknown Uncast Flood Avoidance” should be Unicast >