IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] [dhcwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04

ianfarrer@gmx.com Mon, 14 December 2020 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ianfarrer@gmx.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC3B3A1606; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 08:45:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XFYOXfzRjblG; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 08:45:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6E9E3A1608; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 08:45:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1607964311; bh=/7iqiLHrYzAD/vyULhZ2buF7HaJTjXLUbayMaw7rP2Q=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=NIZ9WmpsVZlI3XyagJP/QukmtSeRt+69N2EsC4KB7DGKMl8EXdWlN0uZikcSluEXk cvxvlKRmqGPAiekKEm2HRbxONL/MRno4VM7J8FseZA9LpjNCnXjzE0mHgy5GtTYXvl Ryb7t6VMFq6SlcKliugSqqGiGiXanRZnT/i1Y7po=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.128.43] ([78.35.186.37]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N2mFY-1k7vT91m4y-0137Qz; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:45:11 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.20.0.2.21\))
From: ianfarrer@gmx.com
In-Reply-To: <160778789655.8618.14458453067077361976@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:45:10 +0100
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, dhcwg@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <92AF6BB5-5FC0-420C-855B-F9FB50A78C62@gmx.com>
References: <160778789655.8618.14458453067077361976@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.20.0.2.21)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:5r8djYf4hks6puooNlkSkYbiY9xpf53ZwnNHPgoIUWCjH6kch6Y iCx1LPW18d7X7qw4O+itzmsRvdMr+bhNtR+O3Z/cyaKjgOQkDvqFSHJR29rYEVDw8nQ2CQF IANWqWoU2sLMqIqcp82Tfvl94QcV7ictPu118vS7TKzykgH5SzUyT1bqLdqTDTH7CbCpFsp p4AF1M7/qABOnci15sQKw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:z3Z4Rc1pPz4=:HJjJHzwmaiNmaUxekkzmsU 2dXxjDeRqZXPM/w2/CWv5rJcBNqF///wbJag/kVrlpEhVErulp/GPWkugaKjnpmffhGaUz7ue 6XntkH77qzl3PzkqN+/W/LjWSBD0jsWCJvXdY4ljdsdn2e8OcEPL+ChWvBYppBp/DhJReR4q8 jgaMM1Sn4DDv+0Z+2Hl+uoPwq4L6xuSCaNSHXK2hPOdSTz/s2XKOMd1rDOozYAniLDQUevnZw XJQuvMUobnbhHoPmD0RKRT+dMki0J6ooT/uL8bk6DNm+OIvmjioMeMEk2XHI6X2EQq1xqbJik GDxqjvVf1KWryllMdewbO9CtfukasHig4qeOFIBmD0ooA9CN1X6nxa43Ev2NMRCsn1IWipL3R WJbsnBaMiVLKszZhQGNlccpoNnzHPmWv2f69JQReL4aRcXLrdWOkDwK/YOGUGGod/XjHKdMLg fNB06K2ifIvUjYK83gmGRo5DBRUM/FLz83TVLaTvZYfJVD6tL9z6GZbnLu9rxrpqTkLSQOhA3 hFQ/2XMrrWWHCU7rqpg5eZpC7uFFunb/D839/0QGvyYKnYrFpL9TifiYvbRksYwj1clftktLq gCBX9yovd0yHsaSgo0uVJ4YlnUJYsDN/saJi6Azn61Ob9faFBFzVxRAIju8ZwYMWC3Ci90yy8 9KnvxOdl72xIKtq9mhw7UKcBukZebV2kuHMOJU2x+h88PQdueQQv26llbs+3lgRdgr8gliUY1 6rvlcA4AOz848RBDhUT+S3UeLA90LlWjfR75YfbvPd3GNvbS+tZZHBAEn1oZLaEBln1VQTQj6 fc3kzJCJnTEFYoq8M9dz6ibeGIIeuCiDGhJ52rG6rAVgWmLLbuqMdCcLkj/+kHFDKxkdyqU0P SVqYqUez/+iNrEyrofXg==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/_Rn1k_AoYhuhhYk6QifncK63bqo>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [dhcwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 16:45:17 -0000

HI Ron,

Thanks for the review and comments.  Please see inline below.

Ian

> On 12. Dec 2020, at 16:44, Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-??
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review Date: 2020-12-12
> IETF LC End Date: 2020-12-14
> IESG Telechat date: 2020-12-17
> 
> Summary: The document is ready for publication with nits as a standard track RFC
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 1. first sentence in section  3.5 "If the client loses information about a
> prefix that it is delegated ..." not clear "it is”

[if - Suggested reword:

If the client loses information about an an active prefix lease it has been delegated...

]

> 2. section 7 "This document
> does not add any new security considerations beyond those mentioned in Section
> 22 of [RFC8213]." RFC8213 does not have section 22 , did you mean of RFC8415?

[if - RFC8213 is correct. The draft has been updated just to reference RFC8213, rather than
any specific section as the whole document is relevant.]

> 
> 3.  In section 7 are there any security requirements for the operational
> interface requirements from section 4.4?

[if -  Good point. How about adding a reference recommending that RFC4778 (Current Operational Security Practices in             
Internet Service Provider Environments) is implemented?]

> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email