Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-abfab-aaa-saml-12

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

On 11-12-2015 18:10, Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng) wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
>>>
>>>> 2.In general I was wondering why this is an Informational 
>>>> document. It
>>>> defines procedures and has normative language.
>>>
>>> That sounds like kind of an unfortunate bug. For some reason, it 
>>> changed
>>> from Standards Track to Informational between versions -00 and -01.
>>> However, we want it standards-track with a normative downreference 
>>> to
>>> radsec. Can it be done at this moment or does it require a more 
>>> complex
>>> process?
>>
>> Hmm. The shepherd write-up says informational is correct. If the WG
>> chairs want to, we can re-spin the IETF LC. But this has been so
>> long in the process and has slowly so I'd prefer to not do that
>> unless someone really cares, and it makes a difference.
>>
>> For now, I've kept this on the Dec17 IESG telechat as informational
>> but if needed we can push it into the new year.
>
> The authors unanimously prefer standards track, so I'm afraid a new
> last call is required.

Fair enough. Will you check quickly with the WG then I'll start that?

Ta,
S.


>
> Klaas