Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020-01

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 06 May 2020 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B07B3A0B2F; Wed, 6 May 2020 08:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=GzRd0wGX; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=uF3cCAOk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id McoKhzDKuI3z; Wed, 6 May 2020 08:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 297F73A0B25; Wed, 6 May 2020 08:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643D05C00B5; Wed, 6 May 2020 11:24:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 May 2020 11:24:26 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= from:message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; s=fm3; bh=ANLGfsWr8vJmPr1SVeMDGbj YgHvWDJL8BLz/JbBscuM=; b=GzRd0wGXL0wHuiywtk6CgZwFrRdsiyrWV8ax49z w6q5iBChu8AWRXiwzGXBcMowYP+IGG6xvg7R5i7cymDivv0Fa3HF5VmfiKXXWT5j Wdujm8ALqhRBSmRdTTDd6CQ+bjo43QXok37qw6cgZL0mEas0Xuu/aSirJjDYaxJR BtM7MwUdWVauLYXKGnbpsTfJINCt61dTcxymaIrwCFDby5AqSN5ZhIjKM2m3yMxG wwqUjXRnRQGd7GgW+HQBu9dieyx318wOTHTjUvHt2CvZkgC2sJ3h76MY/4BD/Hfg /pbHntkP7DplfFUd81Z9D1u+nJdP5CUtEFIAlVZbnTtH74A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ANLGfs Wr8vJmPr1SVeMDGbjYgHvWDJL8BLz/JbBscuM=; b=uF3cCAOk3dr0g/zKLMVKEy U0NVrlV9U0zy3FN9nD2fhmspQf1J1xKLBiLq+iLbkzrvJiD14HCD7sUm8TIs/tZQ ZSUYJQriEy19gANvJLav1JYqG+pde+PoOrNgvzeJsNqDGVL9EkuCBrJmgA3avPes EStBb7Q/1ftQpo3jjbvI4sPjHtWd+ffs15nZgSiAEhzgSH9mdTTGKIJkNUgRWhlc 7NF1+pM11F9zYlMM/PpFsPRQ+PxsnQk1Pj378cGVzs/uLCOB01v2rcCcyMzi7qBN akW4voREFt0lBIXjOtPEziDiH65LwVOwdwx1temWepGTV/ImV/6cGEnf7/UhgtkA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:qtayXu0eAlPzcpXLi89E0T8t8BbN5BrNb_JoFxWetLtfH0EcFmlWog>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrjeekgdekhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhkfgtggfuffgjvfhfofesrgdtmherhhdtvdenucfhrhhomheptehlihhsshgr ucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeelteekheffkeeuuedutedviedutedvtdffheeigeetjeelhfdtteeiffdvudeu teenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedujeefrdefkedruddujedrke egnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghl ihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:qtayXsMJE79mzh6qUFN_5rEaNsrMWMG2eQTeYzgLl2mi2xlg145gHQ> <xmx:qtayXhOKGGdTpX8U7yXztx4Y8hutYS4gNauIBlYGZLvA06P8Reg7mA> <xmx:qtayXsbTzFObeeiWBwP_Tdp71H_bEjQrfqAb8AgJxk3QOIHbby6pgQ> <xmx:qtayXv4bOLHe3h9cXyl6ejk6aicTPgDvfzCoWNJ0H_91DHKuWmQZAg>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.84]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B97183066119; Wed, 6 May 2020 11:24:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-Id: <14561EE1-E36A-4F99-B99F-1833D0331A38@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_503E38A4-112B-43F6-A04D-97A9B3A9CFDC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 11:24:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAP+sJUf15BJcHqyy7NyTv-QqxdWLYPDsWdthXzjX_qaERENTrw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, last-call@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020.all@ietf.org
To: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <158825009899.14758.9073634112286890166@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJLL9mb_1vzKV6JG=5rr7izLL3UTmcv=0JKeAm-Knk5ysw@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+sJUf15BJcHqyy7NyTv-QqxdWLYPDsWdthXzjX_qaERENTrw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/_jxBpqHSZaBLis5E-eI_Usx7Jx0>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 15:24:29 -0000

Ines, thanks for your review. Barry, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Apr 30, 2020, at 10:58 AM, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Barry,
> 
> Thank you for the fast response and addressing the comments.
> 
> Have a nice day,
> 
> Ines.
> 
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 5:13 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org <mailto:barryleiba@computer.org>> wrote:
> Thanks for your review, Ines.  Reasonable comments, and we'll consider
> them as we go into IESG Evaluation.  (On comment 3, I'm just going to
> make the necessary change myself, and remove the CREF, so it's moot.)
> 
> Barry
> 
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 8:35 AM Ines Robles via Datatracker
> <noreply@ietf.org <mailto:noreply@ietf.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Reviewer: Ines Robles
> > Review result: Ready with Nits
> >
> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> > by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> > like any other last call comments.
> >
> > For more information, please see the FAQ at
> >
> > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>>.
> >
> > Document: draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020-01
> > Reviewer: Ines Robles
> > Review Date: 2020-04-30
> > IETF LC End Date: 2020-04-30
> > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> >
> > Summary:
> >
> > This document provides a one-time interpretation of the eligibility rules (BCP
> > 10) that is required for the exceptional situation of the cancellation of the
> > in-person IETF 107 meeting. This document only affects the seating of the
> > 2020-2021 NomCom and any rules that relate to NomCom eligibility or process
> > before IETF 108, and does not set a precedent for the future.
> >
> > The document is clear and well written. Please find some comments below.
> >
> > Major issues: Not found
> > Minor issues: Not found
> > Nits/editorial comments:
> >
> > Some comments/questions:
> >
> > 1- It would be nice to add a reference here
> >
> > Section 1:
> >
> > "...resulting in its conversion to a limited-agenda virtual meeting, with remote
> >    participation only.":
> >
> >    e.g. [IETF 107 Virtual] =
> >    https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/Gqc4-GIsnvccObQrrciL_Vm0HMU/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/Gqc4-GIsnvccObQrrciL_Vm0HMU/>
> >
> > 2- Should this clarification be added?
> >
> > " ...before IETF 108..." --> "...before IETF 108 (virtual or in-person
> > meeting)..." e.g. in the introduction or in section 3.
> >
> > 3- Related to this comment
> > [https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kHVPn0tyF5o4Rvd3aZ51JA2MDtU/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kHVPn0tyF5o4Rvd3aZ51JA2MDtU/>]
> >
> > "... In section 2, last paragraph, I suggest changing the CREF to, "Note: The
> > previous two sentences will be replaced before publication with, 'This document
> > contains the outcome of that discussion.'...."
> >
> >   Should this suggestion be applied?
> >
> >   Note that CREF2 mentions "the previous sentence", not "the previous two
> >   sentences...."
> >
> > 4- It would be nice to add a reference to eligibility-discuss mailing list/
> > draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand
> >
> > Section 3:
> >
> > "...as there will be time for proper community work on such an update..."
> >
> > Thus, e.g. "...community work on such an update (e.g. efforts such as
> > [Eligibility-discuss-ml] and [Eligibility-criteria])"
> >
> > [Eligibility-discuss-ml]=
> > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
> > [Eligibility-criteria]=
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand/>
> >
> > Thank you for this document,
> >
> > Ines.
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art