IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-15

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Fri, 06 August 2021 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374FC3A24AE; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iAwQX5WfDHRg; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B097C3A24D4; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:b0b1:974:c10e:6775]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16E3B6003D5; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 11:25:28 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1628238328; bh=GSIE3qvdXIATCm+Uob31MzmNCVAKS3GNQ8dYTH/SJ6M=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=yUfC/RB7DpQ7+CcMxabT0021y74wASCR95fmCydFXF001/C+/pS889WCMezsqrRmr QGjsz98DRa8UlqCStA/SzhPDI9lrjhDVtGkrU7S48h5KMn4LuH7U8s4J1EZRavjqj0 f71vRF+gdcMtmqM36XMi4nilQWvQSObr8EULRXVQ=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <3794082D-D865-473B-97E0-17ACE56A45ED@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_160B58E7-4C3B-467B-92E8-0D8BC0BE22F7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:25:27 +0300
In-Reply-To: <159233371662.7879.15194255085695763961@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, rtgwg@ietf.org
To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
References: <159233371662.7879.15194255085695763961@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 16E3B6003D5.A6564
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/_o7wGV2C9HqRoQA7AGzJluls9HY>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-15
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 08:25:44 -0000

Francesca, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document.

Lars

> On 2020-6-16, at 21:55, Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Francesca Palombini
> Review result: Ready with Issues
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-15
> Reviewer: Francesca Palombini
> Review Date: 2020-06-16
> IETF LC End Date: None
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: This draft is basically ready but has one minor issue, described in
> the review.
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> In the last paragraph of Section 4 there are a number of non-normative may,
> should, must. I believe the last "should" at least could be normative:
> 
>> Also, implementations should have validation to assure
>> that there is no recursion amongst nested routing policies.
> 
> (More of a question than an issue) I was surprised that all but one references
> were considered normative. Is that common to consider the RFC that appear in
> the model as normative references for the document?
> 
> Note that for the version reviewed, the Yang Validation for
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-15 failed: err : Data model "ietf-if-extensions"
> not found.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email