[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-06.txt
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Wed, 29 October 2014 00:05 UTC
Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AB71A1B6E for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mo4o5k9Aw3Ni for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 250861A1B67 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ak8LAMsuUFSHCzIm/2dsb2JhbABcgkgjIyA0WAS6VAaReoFEIgEJh00CgR4WAQEBAQEBcQuEBAEBAxIbTBIBFQcOViYBBA4NARmIHwEMpWSfUwEKAQEBAQEchjWIQYFCAQEeIBGCPQ9EJIEeBY9tgh6ESohEPIMNgx2OH4N4bAGBDjmBAwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.04,806,1406606400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="92173297"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast-smtpauth.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.38]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2014 20:05:06 -0400
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC02.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.12]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 28 Oct 2014 20:05:06 -0400
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC02.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.12]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 01:05:05 +0100
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-06.txt
Thread-Index: Ac/zC/bLDaONUugNQDerFFQ1FwaPGg==
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:05:04 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8E3940@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.45]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8E3940AZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/aKjFKpcvjXM13r13Ulpxzz5viHo
Cc: "draft-ietf-softwire-map-t.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-softwire-map-t.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-06.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:05:16 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-06.txt Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 10/28/2014 IETF LC End Date: 10/10/2014 IESG Telechat date: 10/30/2014 Summary: Ready with issues. One issue from my initial review was not clarified IMO. The status of this document is Experimental. It is not clear why. There are no experimental documents in the softwire WG charter, and the status of the 'sister' document draft-ietf-softwire-map is Standards Track. Why the difference? The discussion around that issue shows that the editors seem to be in disagreement with the chairs about the status of the document. See mail http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg10713.html. I suggest that the IESG discussed this issue before approving the document.
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-s… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)