[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-07

Linda Dunbar <Linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Thu, 03 May 2018 23:10 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Linda Dunbar <Linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: dime@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis.all@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152538902971.11660.12472378818274345823@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 16:10:29 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/aNqFhBIYHWh9_md1AcnQV5q66_M>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-07

Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Almost Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-07
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review Date: 2018-05-03
IETF LC End Date: 2018-04-12
IESG Telechat date: 2018-05-24

Summary:
The document is well written for the part describing how end-users/CC-client
request services from Credit Control server.

Is it mandatory to use the Section 4 provided mechanism for Rating Input to the
Credit Control? Can the Credit Control get credit rating from offline process
(manual, offline, etc)?

Major issues: None

Minor issues: Is Section 4 mechanism mandatory?

Nits/editorial comments:

Regards, Linda Dunbar

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-d… Linda Dunbar
Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Yuval Lifshitz
Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Alissa Cooper