Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-04

[Spencer Dawkins at IETF <[e-mail]>]

On May 23, 2018 7:10 AM, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <[e-mail]>
wrote:

Hi Spencer,



If co-authors are satisfied with the version I sent

on May 9th, then we are ready to go.


I'll give the authors a day to object, and then get this draft placed on a
telechat agenda ...

Spencer

 FYI – I’m taking a few days off, so replies will be

delayed, like this one.



regards,

Al



*From:* Spencer Dawkins at IETF [mailto:[e-mail]]
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 22, 2018 11:02 AM
*To:* MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <[e-mail]>
*Cc:* Francesca Palombini <[e-mail]>; gen-art <
[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]

*Subject:* Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-04



Hi, Al,

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:23 AM MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <[e-mail]>
wrote:

Spencer wrote:

If you folks can contact the original authors and ask if they have any
objections to use of the updated copyright boilerplate now, that may come
in handy the next time IPPM needs to update 2330.



If you can't, it's probably best to update the copyright disclaimer now.



[acm] I updated the disclaimer in the working version.

I think there are a few more editorial comments to resolve.



I think we're just waiting for a fairly small -05 revision to put this on a
telechat, is that the way it looks to you?



Spencer



Al



*From:* Spencer Dawkins at IETF [mailto:[e-mail]]
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 8, 2018 1:20 PM
*To:* Francesca Palombini <[e-mail]>
*Cc:* MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
*Subject:* Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-04



Hi, draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6.all,



On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:43 AM, Francesca Palombini <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> [acm]
> We can add the pre-5378 disclaimer as a catch-all, but I doubt the
original
> authors would make any fuss about the small amount of common text with
> 2330.
> Almes, Paxson, Mahdavi and Mathis are all gentlemen and the best of their
> time.
>

I'm sure they are :) Just relaying what the id-nits told me.



If I might make an observation - the discontinuity between pre-5379 and
post-5370 copyright grants isn't going to get better (until all pre-5370
RFCs are Historic), and we already have some running code from pre-5370 RFC
authors becoming unreachable (in extreme cases, because they died).



If you folks can contact the original authors and ask if they have any
objections to use of the updated copyright boilerplate now, that may come
in handy the next time IPPM needs to update 2330.



If you can't, it's probably best to update the copyright disclaimer now.



Thanks!



Spencer