Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc7001bis-08
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 08 May 2015 00:26 UTC
Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE3A1B2D34; Thu, 7 May 2015 17:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FYIow2KLKOPb; Thu, 7 May 2015 17:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA0731B2D31; Thu, 7 May 2015 17:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wizk4 with SMTP id k4so10722084wiz.1; Thu, 07 May 2015 17:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4qo5dUWNGnFCk7OY0mQ6r3cpcbAk65wguIUINEMvVf0=; b=B/5wyi7cI7ibpW3YXUOdNyTyOas30VVbP+qrIw9UHeJY7Jga/e/6O7T1BqHaXpi3YP eY+yUKoVBQ/kzdNCNpzfAv04Y05cpduX4vVQjBHxQzIWldbUMtCzCxflqLKp9B+HeTFC +8xJat+ahJxBsmWClgXd6dINi1nCWYuHosT4W0cYVrhx/ABKY+cVb/MRILoETzWwNzc0 m0IJjhRF/7+PNm/pt4ySfrBqA+4YarGjDlEIyRsjb+Io9NUzuS8aMA9oUVEK9HWpg8W3 bGRicOGO34DGLuEEd74e45Z9ZDxC705yR2gnSxzDFuLzddTdvMZT34fsDXiBFSXi6Xwd U7RQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.99.2 with SMTP id em2mr1253688wib.59.1431044766495; Thu, 07 May 2015 17:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.27.170.75 with HTTP; Thu, 7 May 2015 17:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <554C00EE.6050803@gmail.com>
References: <554C00EE.6050803@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 17:26:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZoUDOHxPjb0SZxGnW9s0o9LA9TXWWPY6jhyHNivjbSLQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d04426c68f6fb0e051587128c"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/asoUKCIHD5MkCp07s2uFY56QeBM>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc7001bis.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc7001bis-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 00:26:09 -0000
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Brian E Carpenter < brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > > It seems the author didn't see my Last Call review, so this review has not > changed. > > Nope, I hadn't. Apologies for that. > As the writeup says, this is an update to a long document that mainly > resolves a > notified erratum and some oversights in the previous version's IANA > material. > Therefore I did not review the whole document. As far as I can tell, the > changes > reflect the description in the writeup. (I assume that IANA will work with > the > author to get the registry updates exactly right.) > Yes, that's already happening behind the scenes. > Minor Issue: > ------------ > > IMHO the "Change History" section should be summarised in a "Changes since > RFC7001" > section (rather than being deleted). > Sure, that seems a reasonable suggestion. Nit: > ---- > > 6.7. SMTP Enhanced Stauts Codes > > s/Stauts/Status/ > Fixed for next version. Thanks! -MSK
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-a… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ie… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ie… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ie… Jari Arkko