Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc2845bis-06

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 18 March 2020 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FEE3A1A2D; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=QJfkjLUO; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=YnLplkBp
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RMSWja2ju-iq; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37F4F3A19D5; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA885C01A9; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 14:47:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 18 Mar 2020 14:47:18 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=y yye7YJGVuD3BFk8ExOl6/ZbT4vcfHzq8V2dHIP5CmQ=; b=QJfkjLUOUPmZZ8FS/ 5xCn/92PDiUvLSDm5+GZcx4ZCXL0Xdn1ivQ1QbW89It4dRVlBx23oB58hfv0a0sv vEwcNMi9sXUUL7vxax9PhpVNISWaQlouSjZa0TqnxoxCEZ5p/pBDhmCt2BsX6kiM mzT2auTCFQ/58TBJWTjYkFR6/+J/hc1vgffWupGWexVSnK0V3HniHNhXEc5RgJPU IfFPHzBuI7+snRtNmpXrRqE17aMBQjpEtBuk2i6sM/HaYiVXrtNXA9poSuPwq2Zf DuAGeB0GPlFWbgXnSPuF/bRfmkIlRRHKM8ZUHdDGSrrqmWN13BF04m8JskTm9DXI wjgOg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=yyye7YJGVuD3BFk8ExOl6/ZbT4vcfHzq8V2dHIP5C mQ=; b=YnLplkBpGpBP89uNvR/cxnkTG9/sGqMpDEWM7a1NNDU7SnvXcoQ2AS6OB tOeAdNn4ZmXu8/Xsu+S/c7ZN1X6VwV/Yo1XCQfnm6X13bi+wpc7cwfoGklMR7gH7 75cS5a7UJJFJYsdJs10sPv3ldCxtB563iZO9H2NSGQBwwuTP8uY2mSI7mxe5l5ik pZPfbUH/MSufklWh3aapUn7c/fDlC7zkbYCQv9Zaq1lJQKkbt3ldnLrhrwxZv2Oy TlljtuUSpfNBboNUe4U2KPBeSwn3zbbGTlR1H6XyPrf/1AQJ8ExZOIO+TJNUlqHl zk7Lj2AbFqUEo511jZHv7DdlUfS0g==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:tWxyXhH5j_l6z04Vsn0IXM9LenM8vVYvbUvI-rjY9flv004BiRC8Sg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudefjedguddutdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesth hqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomheptehlihhsshgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrges tghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgpdgvgigrmhhplh gvrdhnvghtnecukfhppedutdekrdehuddruddtuddrleeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihii vgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrd hinh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:tWxyXkNYk27e2yIv7sZhm5Dqpb8HlVY-UK6-G5x6Hjtgx8xYG81xXQ> <xmx:tWxyXsM6oplW9TRMl7lK4o98pnzVUQMMJ4sTvlZM7Ys9fLKF5_Cd-g> <xmx:tWxyXoWUtAsIYsONOpI5WuRdxIvrWPtRYYk_QoQN5MgfBY3--J2P8w> <xmx:tmxyXtERtLvyoy4VHfG897sN183PesydoerbNpqnU0muwuLDNmVkNA>
Received: from alcoop-m-c46z.fios-router.home (pool-108-51-101-98.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.101.98]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 39E8B3280063; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 14:47:17 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <157964060037.28937.10545639935932775108@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 14:47:15 -0400
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc2845bis.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2ECFBC8B-64E8-4851-8EE5-C02C2756E8AA@cooperw.in>
References: <157964060037.28937.10545639935932775108@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/axN29ntcLcTJa_KH6x3p-Svl6eM>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc2845bis-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:47:25 -0000

Jouni, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Jan 21, 2020, at 4:03 PM, Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc2845bis-??
> Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
> Review Date: 2020-01-21
> IETF LC End Date: 2020-01-21
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This document was well written and easy read. I found no complaints. There are
> bogus IDNits warnings for "non-RFC2606-compliant FQDNs".
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> None.
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> None.
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> 1) The sentence in lines 248-250 was hard to parse in the first few reads. I
> suggest rewording... somehow. It was like this in RFC2845 already, though.
> 
> 248                    If hosts A.site.example and B.example.net share a key,
> 249              possibilities for the key name include <id>.A.site.example,
> 250              <id>.B.example.net, and <id>.A.site.example.B.example.net.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art