[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-07

<david.black@emc.com> Fri, 02 March 2012 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB5C21F86A4 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 08:10:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.741
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.741 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.858, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dcPLXDyAP3Ni for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 08:10:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BD721F86A3 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 08:10:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI01.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.54]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id q22GA3R2027096 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:10:04 -0500
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (mailhubhoprd04.lss.emc.com [10.254.222.226]) by hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:09:49 -0500
Received: from mxhub31.corp.emc.com (mxhub31.corp.emc.com [128.222.70.171]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id q22G9m4b007798; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:09:48 -0500
Received: from mx14a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.157]) by mxhub31.corp.emc.com ([128.222.70.171]) with mapi; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:09:48 -0500
From: <david.black@emc.com>
To: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, <behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, <draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis@tools.ietf.org>, <ietfdbh@comcast.net>, <housley@vigilsec.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:09:47 -0500
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-07
Thread-Index: Acz4Ut7OT7UOo/dbT62z7OOanFO9dAAACN3gAA5cHVA=
Message-ID: <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E05AEC8CF59@MX14A.corp.emc.com>
References: <20120302085946.9099.27039.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35D88B26958@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35D88B26958@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EMM-MHVC: 1
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:10:06 -0000

I checked the diffs between the -06 and -07 versions of this draft; the -07 version addresses the concerns in the Gen-ART review of the -96 version, and includes the additional RFC references cited in the new text.  The -07 version is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.

Thanks,
--David


> -----Original Message-----
> From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com [mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 4:02 AM
> To: behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis@tools.ietf.org; ietfdbh@comcast.net;
> housley@vigilsec.com; Black, David
> Subject: RE: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-07.txt
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> This updated version includes in particular the text proposed by D. Balck.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> > Envoyé : vendredi 2 mars 2012 10:00
> > À : behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org;
> > draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis@tools.ietf.org;
> > ietfdbh@comcast.net; housley@vigilsec.com
> > Objet : New Version Notification -
> > draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-07.txt
> >
> > New version (-07) has been submitted for
> > draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-07.txt.
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-behave-64-analy
> > sis-07.txt
> >
> >
> > Diff from previous version:
> > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-behave-64-analysis-07
> >
> > IETF Secretariat.
> >