Re: [Gen-art] [HOKEY] Fwd: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 08 February 2012 16:45 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C2721F86DF; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:45:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UWVquEMrRESe; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:45:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.cs.tcd.ie [IPv6:2001:770:10:200:889f:cdff:fe8d:ccd2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782DC21F8617; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:45:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAF1171C91; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:45:35 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1328719534; bh=Y0XiOc+1BGwLBw ZiB8o668Mh2d+oAcGhlOwsYxlASZg=; b=3p2bis5GWtmIdlDpjH6HNf+2VohCAk shEZWugiOHRyxHphc3SsXQaZi517913ADxb0x8WrEFDcacSm/altEWUprI549Dss memS21SuuuuQcG6Rl76LeCh0El1xHpnrLkxTbO5afPg6OQyPkC75tlbOLyW1fcPK qYPQnUfehR9ihrh/h+g2ivabdkM7FtaekY9WkN3e+70pxG36Z9v2cCcMT5r9pq4W TaL5/pCOfcbEsnE+2ZGqBp2wRB49GScHJOJ6It1COkW6biB/uzmqEuGgcjn2/7zG shIC8aco89YMUDsJtAiOIoX1rfY6z2+PYtc3SyJtdH0gEitYaNA1PYfA==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id 3Y5WgGqKNBZY; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:45:34 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.180] (stephen-think.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E092171C2F; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:45:27 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <4F32A6A8.3010502@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:45:28 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Miguel A. Garcia" <Miguel.A.Garcia@ericsson.com>
References: <4F2AA2F8.4010004@ericsson.com> <4F2AA5E2.2040106@cs.tcd.ie> <20857042-B4A9-4861-8AC2-5E7324DFEE16@huawei.com> <4F325F78.5070701@cs.tcd.ie> <E97BCF9E7A34470B9143D2F62222294A@china.huawei.com> <4F32802B.8090007@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F32802B.8090007@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "hokey@ietf.org" <hokey@ietf.org>, Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [HOKEY] Fwd: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:45:57 -0000
Thanks Miguel, (cc'ing gen-art to close that loop) S. On 02/08/2012 02:01 PM, Miguel A. Garcia wrote: > I did a quick past to the changes that I requested, and I think they are > successfully implemented in version -08. > > /Miguel > > On 08/02/2012 13:52, Qin Wu wrote: >> Hi, Stephen and all: >> We have just done the update. Diff from previous version: >> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-08 >> >> Would you like to go ahead? >> >> Regards! >> -Qin >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Stephen Farrell"<stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> >> To: "Tina TSOU"<Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> >> Cc:<miguel.a.garcia@ericsson.com>;<hokey@ietf.org> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 7:41 PM >> Subject: Re: [HOKEY] Fwd: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07 >> >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> IETF LC is ended for this. >>> >>> I think the only comment I saw a gen-art review (is >>> that right?) but that there are changes resulting from >>> that so I've marked this as revised I-D needed. Please >>> submit a -08 that includes the changes needed. (I'm not >>> sure if any of those will require something different >>> from IANA, but if they do please also respond to IANA's >>> mail, cc'ing me, if their actions are changed.) >>> >>> As soon as we have that I can put this on an IESG >>> telechat agenda, >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Stephen. >>> >>> >>> On 02/04/2012 07:21 PM, Tina TSOU wrote: >>>> Good catch. Thank u, Miguel. >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPad >>>> >>>> On Feb 2, 2012, at 7:04 AM, "Stephen >>>> Farrell"<stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> FYI >>>>> >>>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>>> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07 >>>>> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:51:36 +0100 >>>>> From: Miguel A. Garcia<Miguel.A.Garcia@ericsson.com> >>>>> To: Zhen Cao<zehn.cao@gmail.com>, Hui Deng<denghui02@gmail.com>, >>>>> sunseawq@huawei.com, Stephen Farrell<stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> >>>>> CC: General Area Review Team<gen-art@ietf.org> >>>>> >>>>> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) >>>>> reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the >>>>> FAQ at >>>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> >>>>> >>>>> Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may >>>>> receive. >>>>> >>>>> Document: draft-ietf-hokey-erp-aak-07 >>>>> Reviewer: Miguel Garcia<miguel.a.garcia@ericsson.com> >>>>> Review Date: 2011-01-02 >>>>> IETF LC End Date: 2012-02-07 >>>>> >>>>> Summary: This draft is on the right track but has open issues, >>>>> described >>>>> in the review. >>>>> >>>>> Major issues: >>>>> >>>>> - None >>>>> >>>>> Minor issues: >>>>> >>>>> - The main problem I have with this draft is the lack of normative >>>>> text >>>>> (RFC 2119 reserved words) in relevant paragraphs. If >>>>> interoperability is >>>>> to be granted, an effort should be taken in adding quite a few more >>>>> normative statements. >>>>> >>>>> However, having said that, the section where I find more that there >>>>> should be more normative text, is Section 3, which is an "Overview" >>>>> section. In general, an overview section should use descriptive, >>>>> but not >>>>> normative text. >>>>> >>>>> For example, take the last paragraph in Page 5 (that continues to Page >>>>> 6). One possible change is to make normative the text and move it >>>>> outside >>>>> a section whose title is "Overview". >>>>> >>>>> Upon receiving the message, the ERP/AAK server MUST first use the >>>>> keyName indicated in the keyName-NAI to look up the rIK and MUST >>>>> check the integrity and freshness of the message. Then the ERP/AAK >>>>> server MUST verify the identity of the peer by checking the username >>>>> portion of the KeyName-NAI. If any of the checks fail, the server >>>>> MUST send an early- authentication finish message (EAP-Finish/Re-auth >>>>> with E-flag set) with the Result flag set to '1'. Next, the server >>>>> MUST authorize the CAP specified in the CAP-Identifier TLV. In >>>>> success case, the server MUST derive a pMSK from the pRK for each CAP >>>>> carried in the the CAP-Identifier field using the sequence number >>>>> associated with CAP-Identifier as an input to the key derivation. >>>>> (see d. in the figure 1). >>>>> >>>>> Then the ERP/AAK server MUST transport the pMSK to the authorized CAP >>>>> via AAA Section 7 as described in figure 2 (see e.1,e.2 in the figure >>>>> 2). Note that key distribution in the figure 2 is one part of step d. >>>>> in the figure 1. >>>>> >>>>> The the last paragraph in Section 3 also contains an "Optionally", >>>>> which >>>>> I believe should be replaced with a capitalized "OPTIONAL" >>>>> >>>>> Another instance: towards the end of Section 5.2, the text reads: >>>>> >>>>> HMAC-SHA256-128 is mandatory to implement and should be enabled in >>>>> the default configuration. >>>>> >>>>> and should probably be: >>>>> >>>>> HMAC-SHA256-128 is REQUIRED to be implemented and SHOULD be enabled in >>>>> the default configuration. >>>>> >>>>> Similarly, the last paragraph in Section 5.2 reads: >>>>> >>>>> If the EAP-Initiate/Re-auth packet is not supported by the SAP, it is >>>>> discarded silently. >>>>> >>>>> and should probably be: >>>>> >>>>> If the EAP-Initiate/Re-auth packet is not supported by the SAP, it >>>>> SHOULD be discarded silently. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - Another topic, Section 9 (IANA Considerations) reads: >>>>> >>>>> Further, this document registers a Early authentication usage label >>>>> from the "USRK Key Labels" name space with a value: >>>>> >>>>> EAP Early-Authentication Root Key@ietf.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am missing the sentence to name the master registry where the >>>>> USRK Key >>>>> Labels subregistry is stored. This is the Extended Master Session Key >>>>> (EMSK) Parameters registry (I guess). And probably this comment is >>>>> also >>>>> valid for the rest of the IANA actions: the main registry is not >>>>> named, >>>>> and it is hard to find it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> /Miguel >>>>> -- >>>>> Miguel A. Garcia >>>>> +34-91-339-3608 >>>>> Ericsson Spain >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> HOKEY mailing list >>>>> HOKEY@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> HOKEY mailing list >>> HOKEY@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey >
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-erp-… Miguel A. Garcia
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-… Miguel A. Garcia
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-… Miguel A. Garcia
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-… Zhen Cao
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-… Qin Wu
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hokey-… Qin Wu
- Re: [Gen-art] [HOKEY] Fwd: Gen-ART review of draf… Stephen Farrell