IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart Telechat review: draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-07

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 20 August 2015 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E7B1AC3B3; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VjIXtcNVWUgV; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA961A6F87; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EA02CCBE; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:34:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bll86HN_dP36; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:34:06 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F472CC5C; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:34:06 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C6F734B6-811B-4A59-850E-AD429EB13E47"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <55D5DF94.2030003@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:34:06 +0300
Message-Id: <DC452CCA-33CB-4B51-9FBD-C27FBD02D78F@piuha.net>
References: <558B3AEE.2010009@nostrum.com> <55D21E56.7040608@nostrum.com> <3209D838-C031-4689-8CCB-6EAFE25CC2D1@piuha.net> <55D5DF94.2030003@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/bw0xbk75-nQ3rCCgt5S46Hp3gdE>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, grow@ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart Telechat review: draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:34:11 -0000

After some more staring of the data tracker settings, you are of course completely correct,
Robert :-) The document is marked as having IETF consensus setting, so the text that you
quoted will get inserted into the RFC.

Pardon my mistake in assuming it wasn’t.

On the IESG call we had a discussion about this issue. We saw two separate questions:

1) Substance: Is there a consensus behind the document’s recommendations? The sponsoring AD
and the IESG believes so.

2) Editorial: Is it appropriate to use the “the authors recommend…” form for IETF-level
consensus statements? The sponsoring AD took your comment about the formulation
(also recommended by other ADs) and will work with the author to revise the document.
However, this matter is indeed editorial, i.e., a Comment rather than a Discuss level
requirement from the IESG.

So the document will be approved, after some editorial modifications, and will become
an RFC.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email