[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-02

Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 31 October 2019 16:41 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units.all@ietf.org, core@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Message-ID: <157254010642.30489.13409170000311799067@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 09:41:46 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/c2-ooMZRI6IiIPWLB6A-5BX0jEY>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-02

Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-??
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review Date: 2019-10-31
IETF LC End Date: 2019-10-30
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:  The document is very light, describing IANA registration for acronyms
for various UNITs, such as "ms" for Millisecond, "min" for Minute, "kW" for
Kilowatt, etc. While there is no problem of those acronyms, I don't really
understand why it is necessary to have an RFC for this purpose. Many IETF areas
don't even allow Gap Analysis drafts to be published as RFCs.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

Linda Dunbar

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-c… Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
Re: [Gen-art] [core] Genart last call review of d… Carsten Bormann
Re: [Gen-art] [core] Genart last call review of d… Alissa Cooper