Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-nf-eku-02

tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com> Mon, 11 September 2023 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <kondtir@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BB2C151074; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 03:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P_Vd-zLrqQPu; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 03:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 772D2C14CE45; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 03:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2be4bc1ae53so13390761fa.0; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 03:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694426964; x=1695031764; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XOmX1gHQYVaG0MRD2KOAKDLfWBRpgwNo6hGoAnnHvuE=; b=JL8aQ616v+jRbVMgvA2osoobTAV73gotks4AVx2wc+KlUmgLOYaRIqA9ZSjI8ukBLe IHK5M04yflTdjPaIhBH/jc/0NXq3EQgwQGfaEaapGDB4Fy/6CfAb8iOLNoi4UpqxPym8 Y5qbbsbAC1/6K0g2O5IMUlhM068LXFx+fD58tTuB2AUUKHmKi550c+Na87mW4DftMCEf w/5BVFRz3FMOmxtW0WHYhyD2RlzoG6pLMdL+7cwwXDvcOdHe/2Wrta26/4MANPRs7rrM 1GJIld523ZDo3cgm7zBCg9Abmz3sdUMit3k8geiNA2atCQmAoit7oktqhN+XDh9S2N6w Rd8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694426964; x=1695031764; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=XOmX1gHQYVaG0MRD2KOAKDLfWBRpgwNo6hGoAnnHvuE=; b=EGMSL7DAiSZ6f4sQ8DdHD+MOWKrFHiXnNkGcbMDMod5O9pWrnJftdVKG0KFtV1vZ9w iDtivpaQgam0wJIHHw0sI5lVqJio25+PJhgXWbFsqfPhidWDc2UFee0nGQ/vOIYm5g5S Z40xwLyNJFKJDPEZEoHGV9SOKikmiAhvoa/aukhiVvic4y7e/1woa2n8oz4NqelyQ0xk hQxWrZvAw9V+DPVwJDEIe9DQLtePCcu81wdukuugAarUVenuqEPyY6o5k4o+3SKWDJKL 2JlTeIrIqqttqpR64of+0QzWkjsX2+N+iXC6fl0V32/KFbAZLZj5eMBgplJ6cPOYILR8 204Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwMC307orrzjYjDb78CFJP5PCVvbR7zZputGJuENHtZTy1FTg22 KxegsNiT2CeML3xCMuTmRTxTKWf380VRVNr22cmEAuA1
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGodF1fn/IjF5mgwExMLW6kAogJoDWbWVSWd0J/Xxf4VXsxSSm3rA/k4k2jukzBe2xOAWdaMuu4hlVIBE6l9bU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:211b:b0:2bc:e36a:9e32 with SMTP id a27-20020a05651c211b00b002bce36a9e32mr9240706ljq.5.1694426963836; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 03:09:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <169438603682.30087.16995298135960556569@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <169438603682.30087.16995298135960556569@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 15:39:12 +0530
Message-ID: <CAFpG3gcHfvH4p=yC7jH=FcPet+jN5cs2E6L2VbyjL8uZVPySnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lamps-nf-eku.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, spasm@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000047078e0605128514"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/cDNW_q16cC8eR0XCD03Xt_fURuM>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-nf-eku-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 10:09:27 -0000

Hi Elwyn,

Thanks for the review. We will address these comments in the next revision.

Best Regards,
-Tiru

On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 04:17, Elwyn Davies via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-lamps-nf-eku-02
> Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
> Review Date: 2023-09-10
> IETF LC End Date: 2023-09-08
> IESG Telechat date: 2023-09-21
>
> Summary:  Ready with a number of nits.
>
> Major issues:
> None
>
> Minor issues:
> None
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
> Abstract and s1:  It would be useful to provide a reference to 3GPP
> document TS
> 23.501 with a pointer to Section 6 which defines what the Network
> Functions are
> both at the end of the Abstract and in the first para of s1.
>
> s1, 1st bullet: Should '5GC Service Based Architecture' be '5G Core Service
> Based Architecture'?
>
> s1, 2nd bullet: I suggest s/is JSON Web Tokens and is/uses JSON Web Tokens
> which are/
>
> s1. para 6 after bullets:  This starts
> > [RFC5280] specifies several extended key purpose identifiers (EKU),
> >    defined via KeyPurposeIds, for X.509 certificates.
> Using the abbreviation EKU at this point is premature (it is defined in
> para 8)
> and IMO confusing.  I suggest:
>
> > [RFC5280] specifies several key usage extensions,
> >    defined via KeyPurposeIds, for X.509 certificates. Key usage
> extensions
> added to a certificate are > meant to express intent as to the purpose of
> the
> named usage, for humans and for complying libraries. s1, para 7: s/a NF who
> generates/a NF which generates/ [It's a function not a person.]
>
> s1, para 8: s/However, there is currently no KeyPurposeIds/However, there
> are
> currently no KeyPurposeIds/
>
> s3, para 2: s/EKU extention/EKU extension/, s/require the keyUsage
> extension/require the KeyUsage extension/
>
> s4, para after bullet 3 and s5: The abbreviation KU on its own has not been
> defined and is not used elsewhere: s/KU/KeyUsage/ (two places)
>
> s7: s/ The inclusion of EKU/The inclusion of the EKU/
>
> s8, para 1: s/This OID/These OIDs/
>
> s8:  You could add references linking to the two registries referred to in
> this
> section.
>
>
>
>