[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-04

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Tue, 03 April 2012 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77CD11E818E for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TQqGhynw0EIV for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B804411E8180 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7b76ae0000063d8-b7-4f7b4b453e62
Received: from esessmw0197.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain []) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id A3.44.25560.54B4B7F4; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 21:11:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se ([]) by esessmw0197.eemea.ericsson.se ([]) with mapi; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 21:11:01 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die.all@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 21:11:00 +0200
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-04
Thread-Index: AQHNEc1uI67oMnyK/0qDS/XjNsuuzA==
Message-ID: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852C428E2F6D@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 19:11:06 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document:                draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-04.txt

Reviewer:                 Christer Holmberg

Review Date:            2012-04-03

IETF LC End Date:    2012-04-08

IESG Telechat date: (if known) -

Summary:           The draft is ready for publication, with an editorial issue.

Major issues:     -

Minor issues:     -

Nits/editorial comments:

- Section 5, which updates the affected RFCs, is named 'Recommendations'. Would it be better to use 'Updates to RFC XXXX' naming instead, and have a separate section for each RFC updated?