[Gen-art] Review of draft-ieee-urn-03

IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> Thu, 01 December 2016 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996021294B3; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 06:53:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)" <gen-art@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.39.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148060403058.10461.5851900435463585572.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 06:53:50 -0800
From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/cOXxGfx0DbE-7VfsDCZsP2wGz6k>
Cc: draft-ieee-urn.all@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ieee-urn-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:53:50 -0000

Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ieee-urn-03
Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review Date: 2016-12-01
IETF LC End Date: 2016-11-14
IESG Telechat date: 2016-12-01

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC

Just a simple registration document. No concerns.

Major issues:


Minor issues:


Nits/editorial comments: