Re: [Gen-art] [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-bis-04.txt
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 12 April 2015 03:31 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FD51A89A5; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 20:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CUpJxbbwxHyt; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 20:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com (mail-pa0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59A041A89A1; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 20:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pacyx8 with SMTP id yx8so64562983pac.1; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 20:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pzKcUTU5pVXi62bUchmi2q9JSn8uDYQZfeKb2MEZ2yk=; b=tm4lEghQQCGSYD382IU7MhQku6qkgn1W89qJUsZqJfrsjqA20mFP08fzrdcg0dR2Qu SX7L08afPRsdRMlHNxN4SWMVfPYQKuBGSFXZ3QJxWSFH048qntMUiRl05aNPtqnOLN5e T5xIF8BYebz+dv1ZaYD3et/RBnN58NiRvUF1Agh8rlK1QBDLa9Te2XuyYZMlwnVETPxD 0XHx7+DfBaBskO3Nsg6k274wOHWtZNwR37As8hJFKoJy2YSivnwtMa0QuDhssn2sivY9 vRB8q/LJHJUvZbEEnEATHQfZyEprKpbsmUjAJvCoGFOg/bweGrswPgW9alt8fxiJAOWL HPyw==
X-Received: by 10.66.90.134 with SMTP id bw6mr14915487pab.131.1428809496027; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 20:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:533b:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:533b:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id li10sm3246388pbc.33.2015.04.11.20.31.32 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Apr 2015 20:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5529E70C.2090309@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 15:31:24 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-bis.all@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
References: <20150411125610.29353.16150.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <71F77327-B704-4242-ADB7-FCAD3CAF9A09@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <71F77327-B704-4242-ADB7-FCAD3CAF9A09@pfrc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/cihN-CFWybIDjUM0WcPLyE7VWBE>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 03:31:38 -0000
>From the viewpoint of my Gen-ART review, this version completely resolves my comment, and if asked to re-review it, the summary will be "Ready". Thanks Brian Carpenter On 12/04/2015 01:00, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > IDR Working Group and IETF main mailing list, > > The following update incorporates changes from directorate reviews and requests from IANA for clarification for the two new registries incidentally created to support this work. I have chosen to utilize the same allocation policy as the existing experimental extended community registry. > > Since no allocation policy was previously documented in the earlier versions of this draft during its last call, the IDR chairs will be issuing another last call including these changes. This gives the IETF community appropriate time to comment on the documented policy. > > -- Jeff > >> On Apr 11, 2015, at 8:56 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >> >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of the IETF. >> >> Title : Clarification of the Flowspec Redirect Extended Community >> Author : Jeffrey Haas >> Filename : draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-bis-04.txt >> Pages : 7 >> Date : 2015-04-11 >> >> Abstract: >> This document updates RFC 5575 (Dissemination of Flow Specification >> Rules) to clarify the formatting of the the BGP Flowspec Redirect >> Extended Community. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-bis/ >> >> There's also a htmlized version available at: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-bis-04 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-bis-04 >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Idr mailing list >> Idr@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr > >
- Re: [Gen-art] [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-fl… Brian E Carpenter