Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-08

[Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>]

Ines Robles via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
    > 1- It would be nice to add in Terminology section that the document uses the
    > terminology of RFC7030 and RFC5272

    > 2- Introduction: "reports from implementers suggest..." It would be nice to add
    > reference/s here

    > 3- Security Considerations:

    > It would be nice to add smth like "security considerations from RFC7030 applies
    > also for the clarifications described in this document."

done.

    > 5- IANA Considerations:
    > It would be nice to add the specific registry that IANA should update.
    > For example, instead of "IANA is requested to update the "Reference" column for
    > the Asymmetric Decryption Key Identifier attribute to also include a reference
    > to
    > this document." you could add smth like (if applicable): " IANA is requested
    > to update the registry SMI Security for S/MIME Attributes
    > (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.2) "
    > with the reference of this document as follows:

    > Decimal - Description                   -Reference
    > 54      id-aa-asymmDecryptKeyID  [RFC7030] [ThisDocument]

    > 4- Appendix A: In id-aa-asymmDecryptKeyID OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {...}

    > 4.1-   pkcs9(9) should be pkcs-9(9) ?

I have done this as per Russ Housley's suggestion.

    > 4.2-   aa(2) should be id-aa(2) ?

I have not done this.

This is in version -09.

--
Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-