Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 15 October 2015 21:31 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E821A3BA2; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.006
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FS_REPLICA=0.994, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tXU8GeiRkzWO; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 100FC1A3B9F; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pabrc13 with SMTP id rc13so98408843pab.0; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aISdZKA7xUsYhx64hmdeJiMeIoTGp08p0ljFOCvDg74=; b=g/CgCPU9qu/YGWtDiMx2gYOQMtMbDN6y7IaDuNeu2NIcLyeGoEBaHNrLpzNs046i7Z eSUDB9G8YG25tJ1kM7t3XdGDRSoIVed0Lhggdt9ItEcoHH0AFiW+F9i7w5r0XGWl3++O ikm/WLAM/nSTAMJfxo4hB4Ft4sMeqXt1Mx2Buv9xnHaegpGjF3bo/oghv9iPA+LZPRRn NURunbaiU1E2+D4ZDqmK9ET0QvKTg7U/B/bqOGzIKdKsQRDkhuaK62zMFcfSRjkVDwzS JgGKhVPrkmZqveJP5O2Wz01f5nzdJQdxRs7mJqib7TNx4L6w68sUuk9XniZj6a3HvCzZ pbeQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.202.40 with SMTP id kf8mr12154511pbc.119.1444944659695; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.137.82] (14-202-184-134.tpgi.com.au. [14.202.184.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id zk9sm17268211pac.7.2015.10.15.14.30.55 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication.all@ietf.org>
References: <561719C5.4020602@gmail.com> <3F4BC72B-620C-45FC-B75A-83FBE8B4FEB9@piuha.net> <BLUPR0501MB17153E8DFC901A6331053ABAD43E0@BLUPR0501MB1715.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <56201B11.8040905@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:30:57 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR0501MB17153E8DFC901A6331053ABAD43E0@BLUPR0501MB1715.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/d0ZOAJx5shiO0pWs5PdnAaB0jyg>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:31:01 -0000
If that "should" is a formal SHOULD then I would say yes, it's an update,
but that needs to be mentioned very explicitly ("This is a change to the
requirements of Section X of RFC Y" or something like that.) That way an
implementer is left in no doubt.
Just IMHO, of course.
Regards
Brian
On 16/10/2015 03:49, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang wrote:
> Brian, Jari, all,
>
> Some information on whether it should be update or extension:
>
> For the particular use case - supporting MVPN C-Bidir (Customer Bidirectional PIM) with Ingress Replication - the optimized procedures in this new specification should be used on all PEs for the involved VPN. The old procedures can still be used (but not mixed) even for this use case but they involve much more signaling.
>
> I am not sure if this constitutes "update" or just an extension and I appreciate your input.
>
> Thanks.
> Jeffrey
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 7:40 PM
>> To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>; draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-
>> bidir-ingress-replication.all@ietf.org
>> Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-
>> bidir-ingress-replication-03
>>
>> Thanks for your review(s), Brian! Much appreciated. Re: the update
>> question. Good question. What say the rest of you?
>>
>> Jari
>
>
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-b… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ie… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ie… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ie… Brian E Carpenter