[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-11

Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Mon, 14 May 2018 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31D512E8A3; Mon, 14 May 2018 13:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop.all@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.80.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152632807068.10078.4478550408904407310@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 13:01:10 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/dCCrrmikudtTSYXs4hxTHk70Yos>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-11
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 20:01:11 -0000

Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready with Issues

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-11
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2018-05-14
IETF LC End Date: 2018-05-24
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This document appears to be ready for publication as an RFC.  The
question of whether it is an Informational RFC or a Proposed Standards track
RFC is one that the ADs should examine.

Major issues:
    This document is quite readable, and quite useful.  If my reading below
    (minor comment about section 4.2) is wrong, then everything is fine. 
    However, reading the text, it does not appear to define SRMS.  Rather, it
    describes a good way to use SRMS to achive smooth SR - LDP integration and
    migration.  As such, this seems to me to be a really good Informational
    Document.

Minor issues:
    Section 4.2 states that it defines the SRMS (Segment Routing Mapping
    Server).  Looking at the relevant routing protocol document, they point to
    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-05 as the
    defining source for the SRMS.  And that document does appear to define the
    SRMS.

Nits/editorial comments: