[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-09

Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com> Wed, 11 July 2012 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBF111E80FB for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GJT4uMrhg1CE for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DB211E810F for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id q6BM7ZcO030174; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:07:50 -0500
Received: from EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se ([]) by eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([]) with mapi; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:07:41 -0400
From: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
To: "draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis.all@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:07:40 -0400
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-09
Thread-Index: Ac1fsY4kFtlzh9NdSKKJzWHPeaNESg==
Message-ID: <25DC600D0CC1F2479C7053ADEB93004E69A29CC01B@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:07:21 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> .

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-09
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2012-07-11
IETF LC End Date: 2012-07-11
IESG Telechat date: -

This draft is almost ready to be published as Informational RFC but I do have some comments.

Major issues:

Minor issues:
-[Page 20], Appendix A, the list only covers changes to existing text in RFC6204. It would help the reader if you could please add a paragraph on new additions, e.g. 6rd, etc.; even though this is mentioned in the Abstract.

-[Page 20], Appendix A, all changes refer precisely to a bullet ID (e.g. G-5, WAA7, etc.) which makes it easier to find the change in the document; except changes #1, 8, 10, 12, 13. It would bring great clarification if you could please add a precise reference in the text for these change items.

Nits/editorial comments:
-[Page 4], "NAT" is first used, please spell out.

-[Page 6], Section 3.2.1, last sentence: the ULA-5 and L-4 are not right below the text but appear one page later. Suggestion:
"..especially requirements ULA-5 and L-4 below."  --> "..especially requirements ULA-5 and L-4 described in Section 4".

-[Page 8] W-6,  [I-D.ietf-pcp-base] is now version v-26.[Page 17] gives reference to v-24.

-[Page 8] W-6, "..is enabled by default or mechanisms by which.." --> "..is enabled by default or using mechanisms by which.."

-[Page 9] WAA-4, IA_NA is first used, reference to [RFC3315] would be useful and consistent with the rest of the sentence. 

-[Page 11] WPD-8, [I-D.ietf-dhc-pd-exclude] is now RFC6603. [Page 17] gives reference to draft v-4.

-[Page 15], DLW-2, "Network Address Translation (NAT)": second time acronym is spelled out in the document. Can just use "NAT" instead.
note: "NAT" is first used and should be spelled out in Section 3.1.

-[Page 15], [MULTIHOMING-WITHOUT-NAT] reference format needs to be updated and point to draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-multihoming-without-ipv6nat-0x

-[Page 20], item 8 has a typo, "if an service provider"---->"if a service provider"


Meral Shirazipour