Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-07

Yuval Lifshitz <yuvalif@yahoo.com> Sun, 06 May 2018 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <yuvalif@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3ED8126CF6 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 May 2018 01:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eDsbxKweGvq7 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 May 2018 01:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonic316-15.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com (sonic316-15.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com [74.6.130.125]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D2CE126BFD for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 May 2018 01:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1525596128; bh=SY+cy1GKG5wTHsnl41QJ28QLMgLP6t0YljEbekO2/U0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=IwekeDXiSugFbwZA18DscUHWjdoSqbiGXP1Qy7x+nM1xgDw4Asueg+PKZAHozZ/F6U+kx/aXGgvNSoSFUapoHLYPL1pma4ZiQRYMzGIgXHEz28WKyTlkpsiHPa1Zv0ZXyvmwqOrcU8h9TBL6HZRGZ+Gn2rjTLnxvuGPpAVgaziqwvphEONXt2dkluzHdsYXveH3pdNxqH7/GMtjqszQ8fgqA2wXAFhghaAYQrg3DIzhjL1WUIWmnGULutko2EyU9iHJxLQnJUC4Y/aRHCInYtea3hs4x7taDz/kNTnkSBryBoSrHnEemwdGdmpgB8D38mqP67f1AduVH1LtjaHB5fQ==
X-YMail-OSG: vhncX3EVM1nIZ4wXWi2t1M_ndH1DYKA2jc7Vh35h.chD0Oc7jeiPAHTMD3uaytH bVBuKYQrC5KL9u9s_hc22hEQkYF70S8kLVhfnTcEySbHBEmqnzSAz94AHGSZ1a.aEcw2UFb5FxEb mFi0qtvaTsbAxeXhzY3uzvRA24y8CFxRDVY.QLMSVbaynWwCNGCYncfRTXWf_j2wljgdGFE.Ok94 GJj_qSHdo_FYZG.OrwsoceNgjgJYaAvLljGPtI3mbWVdGMVYHWX28cWIwsz2JV7NkwmS3klbfl_Y 3oUWoUr0cTolSAyqnB.pGorOjc_GDfFj2q.XUVLDl55i7LYTOrJc7j2WtyRdxrr7nF.8OjO3x_62 2zmvDA_.OfgHdjc.Lc9WcT1eNjJSoTk6CptkiFnGmB574W78ejdFnUpUhPgDMZdCQmTWf6pamQWe sa8W3SElBHcEmshFpwLsDgXEfw8G78r94pAoKUi6FPMj5DSu7FYtsQJ4Tv256DDjLoiGPxDgeFC4 oBk5C2N3Vg9_hM57KAnNncCUjeY.I0WBmGITc35ve0RXuNYXUTY4ip_p65CUpQJwlneBrEOCSwqs sw5FH6AeI1ct_0Pim_vekrdQ2VbvqMGYPGrzAHcLaOHmSa016xQ--
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic316.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sun, 6 May 2018 08:42:08 +0000
Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 08:42:04 +0000
From: Yuval Lifshitz <yuvalif@yahoo.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org, Linda Dunbar <Linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
Cc: dime@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis.all@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1008915678.319348.1525596124850@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <152538902971.11660.12472378818274345823@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <152538902971.11660.12472378818274345823@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_319347_1494035299.1525596124848"
X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.11848 YMailNorrin Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Fedora; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/66.0.3359.117 Safari/537.36
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/dvVvHaHvie6netj5aIZ8Y9_u0aY>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 08:42:11 -0000

 Section 4 does not use normative language that dictates the *only* source for rating would be the CC-client. As the act of rating is done on the CC-server it may take into account other factors (for e.g. may fetch the subscriber's tier from an external system and use it together with service ID coming from the CC-Client to do the rating). However, if the rating input comes entirely from a different source (e.g. consumption of offline UDRs) then we cannot say that the above spec is implemented, as the concepts of online-charging is pivotal to the protocol between the CC-Client and CC-Server.
Yuval