[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-04

David Schinazi via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 05 February 2021 21:44 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Schinazi via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: bess@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <161256144376.17283.10968885311559538599@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 13:44:03 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/e5VvK_YVk6KP_-hkwKHp0cJZPDU>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-04

Reviewer: David Schinazi
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-04
Reviewer: David Schinazi
Review Date: 2021-02-05
IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-16
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Thank you for a well-written document.
  It introduces a lot of terminology I wasn't used to,
  but does a good job of explaining it.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
  - The abstract defines all the acronyms (which is great) except PBB, could it define that one too?
  - Section 2.1 doesn't really explain what a "P node" is.

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-b… David Schinazi via Datatracker
Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Donald Eastlake
Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ie… David Schinazi
Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review… Lars Eggert