IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-uta-xmpp-05

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Mon, 06 April 2015 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27351A904D for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 10:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_29=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yTHElXqbYlv8 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 10:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com (mail-ig0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1C521A905F for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 10:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ignm3 with SMTP id m3so23547528ign.0 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Apr 2015 10:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MdMykPFi1IfR9XLW5Ruwdircy0m7twYio1N6B1Q5GQg=; b=Ze6cP4Fn50i0Eu5gbGIVlhMxpVTUNUuadS264ebD78bHUVNN7G3eDacTvAbXcliH2k +kh7WZKKkMcb0x3rPCSCgQmBEL5ZONVSxrsqSKtKKQL2/QUAJw2kSOBBOdZTYaPtPe7G 2XVYqhqdc4RiNuMUab0ywDLNkms3jSshXor4Ped+SC9J5JA6K60pD53uhTuzE+2bYF7y RJdgW2NDaKnDFCRTgV6YLoDYOnQS1melO3JsJfQOSa26E6CGP90ZlZuDvdHsYXtJ9BC5 QTwAa6E189VmD7bF0WSghz0xtnx/ReG3THgvd9GVU/qjKkFteJxa+9jP9dkZu2EL9cTb amEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkl0tjnaTi/5RBHAoFeYS5mPvmY8Yp5DMeHJV+nOyWIT7JNXwgT+i9oYRT3f/XqTKEAkJIs
X-Received: by 10.42.101.83 with SMTP id d19mr20506494ico.50.1428342337182; Mon, 06 Apr 2015 10:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p76sm3094774iop.14.2015.04.06.10.45.35 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Apr 2015 10:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5522C63F.5090906@andyet.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 11:45:35 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>, draft-ietf-uta-xmpp.all@tools.ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org
References: <020b01d06df4$ed64fa10$c82eee30$@gmail.com> <551EC0E0.3010003@andyet.net> <024501d06e4f$6d983df0$48c8b9d0$@gmail.com> <551F0148.30000@andyet.net> <551F0715.2030504@andyet.net> <025b01d06ea0$ec061a30$c4124e90$@gmail.com> <551F8D89.9030604@mnt.se>
In-Reply-To: <551F8D89.9030604@mnt.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/egDS0H-MnbFNFTsp-pfjeUJKWBo>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-uta-xmpp-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 17:45:47 -0000

On 4/4/15 1:06 AM, Leif Johansson wrote:
> On 04/04/2015 08:30 AM, Roni Even wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>> This text looks good
>> Thanks
>> Roni
>>
>
> I must admit that TZ+threading became too much of a challenge for
> tracking this so I have to ask: are we ok for the gen-art review
> comments now or if not, what is left to address?

Yes, that was a lot of back-and-forth.

I've checked changes into source control, if that helps:

https://github.com/stpeter/uta/commit/63985e345a0589aaca16356c67c0e4507e801b88#diff-6e9d001d331f253ccc440b60aed61980

However, a revised I-D might be most useful and I don't want to submit 
that until after IETF Last Call has ended.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/

v2.20.0 | Report a Bug | By Email