[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-cdni-use-cases-09.txt

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Tue, 17 July 2012 03:55 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D742D11E80A2 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 20:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.578
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IDV9UI2IVGFO for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 20:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr3.ericy.com (imr3.ericy.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E610311E8087 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 20:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([]) by imr3.ericy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6H3uTrZ000789 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 16 Jul 2012 22:56:30 -0500
Received: from [] ( by smtps-am.internal.ericsson.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:56:29 -0400
Message-ID: <5004E266.6060605@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:56:22 -0400
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-cdni-use-cases.all@tools.ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-cdni-use-cases-09.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 03:55:52 -0000

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-cdni-use-cases-09.txt
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
Review Date: 2012/07/16
IESG Telechat date: 2012/07/19

Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC
but I have some comments.


* Section 1.3 & Figure 1

The CSP-2 part of the text is really not a use case but a "non-use
case". Does such text belong in this document?

* Section 2.3

What does the word ingestion mean in this sentence? It usually means
consumption but that usage does not fit since the CDN interconnection
does not change end user traffic consumption points. Did you mean
"ingress" instead?

o  Allow the ISP to influence and/or control the traffic ingestion

* Section 2.4

I am not sure that there is a commonly agreed definition of NSP, but the
use of the term NSP in this section does not fit with my understanding
of NSP (it fits more with an ISP who provides broadband service to end
users). Can you clarify why exactly the term NSP is used here?


* Introduction:

I feel that the word motivate seems to be a better fit for this sentence
than guide,

The document can be used to guide the definition of the requirements (as
documented in [I-D.ietf-cdni-requirements])

This document can be used to motivate the requirements (as
documented in [I-D.ietf-cdni-requirements])