Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-pcn-signaling-requirements-07.txt

[<[e-mail]>]

Hi David,

Okay, thank you!

Best regards,
Georgios

________________________________________
Van: David Harrington [[e-mail]]
Verzonden: zaterdag 14 januari 2012 14:37
Aan: Karagiannis, G. (Georgios); [e-mail]; [e-mail]
CC: [e-mail]
Onderwerp: RE: review of draft-ietf-pcn-signaling-requirements-07.txt

Thank you Francis.

Georgios,
these are all minor editorial changes.
Please make them in your source, but do not submit a new revision yet.
I have scheduled this for telechat and IESG doesn't like moving
targets for telechats ;-)
You may get changes requested by IESG.
When the document is sent to the RFC Editor they will ask for your
source file.

Thanks,
David Harrington
Director, IETF Transport Area
[e-mail] (preferred for ietf)
[e-mail]
[phone] (cell)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 5:35 AM
> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: review of draft-ietf-pcn-signaling-requirements-07.txt
>
> Hi Francis,
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> I will work out all your comments!
>
> Best regards,
> Georgios
>
>
> ________________________________________
> Van: [e-mail] [[e-mail]]
> Verzonden: zaterdag 14 januari 2012 10:13
> Aan: [e-mail]
> CC: [e-mail]
> Onderwerp: review of draft-ietf-pcn-signaling-requirements-07.txt
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call
comments
> you may receive.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-pcn-signaling-requirements-07.txt
> Reviewer: Francis Dupont
> Review Date: 20120106
> IETF LC End Date: 20120113
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
>
> Summary: Ready
>
> Major issues: None
>
> Minor issues: None
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>  - in the whole document: behaviour -> behavior and
> signalling -> signaling
>   (note the spelling of collocated is dubious too)
>
>  - Abstract page 1: in the latter case -> in the first case
>
>  - Abstract page 1: the usage is to not refer to RFC in the Abstract
>
>  - ToC page 2: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments
>
>  - 2 page 3: measures- -> measures (in general the document is at
>  the limit of abuse of '-' character, here it is clearly a typo)
>
>  - 6 page 6: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments
>
>  - 6 page 6: I don't like the term 'generated', IMHO you can easily
>   find a better/nicer term.
>
>  - 7.2 page 7: C. Le Faucher, -> C., Le Faucheur,
>                                    ^          ^
>
> Regards
>
> [e-mail]