Re: [Gen-art] [6tisch] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-06

"Tim Evens (tievens)" <tievens@cisco.com> Fri, 17 January 2020 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <tievens@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00929120059; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 17:21:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=XLcohukx; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=pp89cp2/
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lCbzTGAAoNRg; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 17:21:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7135F12008C; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 17:21:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4000; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1579224098; x=1580433698; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=C5cl11+s9+oZ0AbeS2v7+AOryfuuDToCKdl9IBK3Jro=; b=XLcohukxzKCgxolnrFeH0RRe0nR+HkYp3BjBtnWrDrf/UQSXjJgEwBto OMKyjHANZbsWCZn06UIplkT5XCfqcqOFEfy4OQWS7uyFTN4lY2huYBzfU Ckz1yfbZRUe65XnMN0/Cyf7BVRfj1ACbqrzxVqN/4C4Avctn99hlTuWwf M=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:PMgwNhaMkpFAUGiTlFBKhgb/LSx94ef9IxIV55w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el20gebRp3VvvRDjeee87vtX2AN+96giDgDa9QNMn1NksAKh0olCc+BB1f8Kav2biEkEcJZfFRk5Hq8d0NSHZW2ag==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AbAAAwCyFe/4ENJK1kGwEBAQEBAQEFAQEBEQEBAwMBAQGBZwYBAQELAYFTUAWBRCAECyoKhAaDRgOEWoYfgl+YDoEugSQDVAkBAQEMAQEtAgEBgUyCdAIXgWskNAkOAgMNAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FNwyFXgEBAQMBEhERDAEBNwEPAgEIGAICJgICAjAVEAIEDgUigwSCSwMOIAGhTwKBOYhhdYEygn8BAQWFHBiCDQmBDigBjBsagUE/gREnIIJMPoQiJ4MQMoIsjguCSIYAiU2OOnYKgjmSDIQkG4JHiASQJYNLphUCBAIEBQIOAQEFgVI5gVhwFWUBgkFQGA2IATiDO4pTdIEpigCBMwGBDwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,327,1574121600"; d="scan'208";a="419072386"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 17 Jan 2020 01:21:37 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com (xch-aln-010.cisco.com [173.36.7.20]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 00H1LaD1006545 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 17 Jan 2020 01:21:37 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:21:36 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:21:35 -0500
Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:21:35 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ejbED34spKguCDbxFSnI84YP+9XWTxGBFE4uPEzx7kc7RXAwXh6bUXi6hUn+fyScvvgteHxtSJDJ9sBVgP8Jseq5AP4Jv5LF1E2q7xItQvk5OUH8VCNn+hPnZmO70Hfh66fR4uZdnZm7F3ZMARDE12gmf3Kgmkh0iJuMjBtzVmID8/ty2UrtRoDWWLZC4RQ6VukOPVH0ZVWT0lnXgTkI+xgCH2yCA4PQ0NLNQgCB+cK98etnN33Xhl7CiPbbPc7mh316G4YlNdAPf9Xk0XlinEsBxWMmCaK5PS5uMP1TaCDIO5awTXefYa9nazaDk1aYEVCq2zyOO2qWpGx4VbNHSg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=C5cl11+s9+oZ0AbeS2v7+AOryfuuDToCKdl9IBK3Jro=; b=WmHe/uU4xMspMdbaKyc9eLfFTMo8PMTTj+lps59wyrZafEAvipygO5pbtwx8zdGF7nKVvocaypNT54gFZaeJGkpEcUdeKJf83RT6PMBkdOLyqLOHlFtjHbUIYgEgIr4NC5aq4shfqUyE2hwSUo27IaZaXkK/64mJ2ODklaKK7l0B8isRBDpkbQ+5i11YhvwdsxMgMk7t4KJIe1xUBqg9TEGlb4koaEbsZgp9O4tEk2YxdyhB1E8Akb+ZrS7mZm91xuNn7hahil8hOKsAVNUMgj4OZE4QncTp+TJTQdLDaAttme9iE4TQs/Dv0AHe/PBq/gP29WUR8grCU5yec/YfuQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=C5cl11+s9+oZ0AbeS2v7+AOryfuuDToCKdl9IBK3Jro=; b=pp89cp2/0pW38qJtPaTTCUs8ZWhWtZDefE2cTnwej740ye/htH2WcFtizKYQgVkOQUz2fgmP31R/RS0tHB5kuDJUxPSDzSg7Z+8HhNqVnOTiGJfFHJQ5ZCPKmRJ6Xor/+LtxxxcPAiMsmGRFwum20F2L3pO254bsp1IhDfgFePQ=
Received: from MWHPR1101MB2319.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.174.97.9) by MWHPR1101MB2110.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.174.255.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2623.9; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 01:21:34 +0000
Received: from MWHPR1101MB2319.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::25be:45d8:dc81:b15f]) by MWHPR1101MB2319.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::25be:45d8:dc81:b15f%12]) with mapi id 15.20.2644.015; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 01:21:33 +0000
From: "Tim Evens (tievens)" <tievens@cisco.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
CC: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6tisch] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-06
Thread-Index: AQHVzNHkkrdyFiqFWkCEO8Nz/89Z0qftiSkA
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 01:21:33 +0000
Message-ID: <5CDE4FC7-BDEC-4A37-80E6-1C63BD8E77F1@cisco.com>
References: <157913558775.22436.18264578512376938105@ietfa.amsl.com> <5113.1579222732@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <5113.1579222732@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.20.0.191208
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=tievens@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [128.107.241.182]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1cd5c189-b1c6-4d26-999e-08d79aeb9723
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR1101MB2110:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR1101MB2110C1F5A4F5EA36D2A7FB21B6310@MWHPR1101MB2110.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:6430;
x-forefront-prvs: 0285201563
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(376002)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(346002)(189003)(199004)(66574012)(5660300002)(66446008)(86362001)(66476007)(66946007)(26005)(478600001)(64756008)(2906002)(76116006)(91956017)(66556008)(186003)(2616005)(6486002)(316002)(6512007)(36756003)(33656002)(54906003)(81166006)(8676002)(81156014)(6506007)(8936002)(4326008)(71200400001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR1101MB2110; H:MWHPR1101MB2319.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Nf5RhX+XFdLppfGHzgZ1qxr3inOyXJKRpo06D5DfM1PTsLQGfwrb4J4Sq8s+XKqgSl3c5uEamnwI/8Uxg9NJr5iFKYCvGuq2BycPmgxzcc6bkxIxRkwXQ6Dn+HrULTDtzlgUwjii6rs/F1H1H3GCOwjnJ7P8cPgzB+j/xiWysU2NW9zD5WERXRXy99/aiUAEYqPU/DhAc7rw5Ezz6YyOrTbcOjkkWDbTO92+1JjeRhsol+6IKERIvtonFiLXHAWh7ZuiVy+1OqHXtgpQVZ5Fo4wH8YbgsPkxDYAGYX0ZLDDLOZz82SOZ8uGE2f0B/+F0l2rq87ec/kzXx/ZR9klFfUUIJWl9KZzF0eVdbnX36Kwv5k1pGzoU5BgXg707LXt11p4PBcrltgs8acU+doSNjG5IWPGuzkb7qnFWotUTOPzFoaewrAh/QoxrocYUku0M
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <FEF65CD82329F94DB54A9E7B612A9611@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1cd5c189-b1c6-4d26-999e-08d79aeb9723
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Jan 2020 01:21:33.7320 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: vybkAV60uxI0mEGxviy0OACP7qLqMe11xeprsuu/W1TRH+apVfUS6F3+I/SEfawwKoxYlyR9AWlPLOM493XqPg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR1101MB2110
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.20, xch-aln-010.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/fA1WbJyWRn7DVwXi9hwW_tB6-WQ>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [6tisch] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 01:21:41 -0000

Excellent, thanks! 

On 1/16/20, 5:03 PM, "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:

    Tim Evens via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
        > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
        > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
        > by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
        > like any other last call comments.
    
    Thank you.
    
        > In section 1.2,
        > "These slots are rare, and with 10ms
        > slots, with a slot-frame length of 100, there may be only 1 slot/s
        > for the beacon."
    
        > IMO, this could be reworded to increase clarity. For example, "Considering 10ms
        > slots and a slot-frame length of 100, these slots are rare and could result in
        > only 1 slot for a beacon."
    
    Reworded as you suggest:
    
     There is a limited number of timeslots designated as a broadcast slot by
     each
     -router in the network. These slots are rare, and with 10ms slots, with a
     slot-frame length of
     -100, there may be only 1 slot/s for the beacon.
     +router in the network. Considering 10ms slots and a slot-frame length of
     100,
     +these slots are rare and could result in only 1 slot/s for a broadcast,
     which
     +needs to be used for the beacon.  Additional broadcasts for Router
     +Advertisements, or Neighbor Discovery could even more scarce.
    
        > In section 1.3,
        > "At layer 3, [RFC4861] defines a mechanism by which nodes learn about
        > routers by listening for multicasted Router Advertisements (RA)."
    
        > Would it be possible to reword to not use "multicasted?"  For example,
        > "by receiving multicast Router Advertisements (RA)."
    
    done.
    
        > "no RA is heard within a set time, then a Router Solicitation (RS) may
        > be multicast,"
    
        > "may be sent as multicast" might be more clear.
    
    done.
    
        > In section 2,
        > "proxy priority  this field indicates the willingness fo the sender to
        > act as join proxy.  Lower value indicates greater willingness"
    
        > Typo "fo"
    
    fixed.
    
        > IMO, it would be clearer if the field name in the protocol header
        > matches the description for it. For example, "Proxy priority (proxy prio)"
    
    okay.
    
        > In Section 4,
        > "An interloper with a radio sniffer would be able to use the network
        > ID to map out the extend of the mesh network."
    
        > extend or extent?
    
    extent, thank you catching that.
    
    All this in -07 about to be published.
    
    
    
    --
    Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
     -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-