Re: [Gen-art] [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-09.txt

> On Apr 24, 2018, at 3:21 AM, tom p. <daedulus@btconnect.com> wrote:
> 
> Mahesh
> 
> Almost
> 
> You ask the RFC Editor to
> "replace  reference to RFC XXXX, and draft-ietf-port-twamp-test "
> 
> I think that you mean
> draft-ietf-ippm-port-twamp-test

Fixed.

> 
> I said that I was still thinking about secret-key and still am; I am
> unsure what secret-key should look like.
> 
> There are two rival models for keystore.  RTGWG have produced RFC8177
> which has
> 
> choice key-string-style {
> ...
>     case keystring {
> ..
>                   type string;
>                   description  "Key string in ASCII format.";
> 
>     case hexadecimal {
> ..
>                   type yang:hex-string;
>                   description "Key in hexadecimal string format.
> 
> 
> The NETCONF WG have produced a number of I-D, such as
> draft-ietf-netconf-keystore, all of which have keys of type binary.
> 
> A YANG string, as this I-D currently references, limits the character
> set of string which I do not think works without a binary or hex-string
> alternative.
> 
> I note that
> draft-mirsky-ippm-twamp-light-yang
> went for a keychain-ref while
> 
> draft-ietf-ospf-yang
> has
> case auth-trailer-key {
> ...
>               type string;
>               description  "Key string in ASCII format.";
> without a hexadecimal alterntive which would seem to have limited
> entropy.
> 
> Perhaps binary, as you had it originally, is best but I do think that
> the IETF is confused, or conflicted, here.

I am reverting it back to binary.

> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mahesh Jethanandani" <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
> To: "tom p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>; "Pete Resnick"
> <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
> Cc: <ippm@ietf.org>; <gen-art@ietf.org>; <ietf@ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 5:54 PM
> 
> Tom/Pete,
> 
> We believe this version of the draft addresses your comments.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>> On Apr 23, 2018, at 9:48 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Measurement WG of the
> IETF.
>> 
>>       Title           : Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)
> Data Model
>>       Authors         : Ruth Civil
>>                         Al Morton
>>                         Reshad Rahman
>>                         Mahesh Jethanandani
>>                         Kostas Pentikousis
>> Filename        : draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-09.txt
>> Pages           : 68
>> Date            : 2018-04-23
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>  This document specifies a data model for client and server
>>  implementations of the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP).
>>  The document defines the TWAMP data model through Unified Modeling
>>  Language (UML) class diagrams and formally specifies it using YANG.
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang/
>> 
>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-09
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-09
>> 
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-09
>> 
>> 
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ippm mailing list
>> ippm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
> 
> Mahesh Jethanandani
> mjethanandani@gmail.com
> 

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com