Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-multipart-ct-03

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Tue, 30 April 2019 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5751012029C; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=RlDOeVaZ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=NkaN+3nL
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U7N2rko4Itm9; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 615221202F9; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FEA23489; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:13:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:13:38 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=S L09bhhgt9mSqHG6ci7Ol9syNLsqjHYgcmE0eyeYr7c=; b=RlDOeVaZ1TuL/D4iG uGYwtZ8IYA0a8WjKVeUw84rRkIIjnMpCze/cJIPzL8+TY3RLx0cdxbWSHnQvPd1Q pk861fVfG0ND7Inc2tjXvfpXAsLjjYIpleKyEDPjIaI4C2yJz4+kYDl77vJzcchK y+6S4Uor814rtnivd43A21P6tKo9f7w8kG9lJlDepZNXy+rFQVeeLNkOYYLBjRJr qpIAUZDJetrp7XsKWlQkFiuhyHq5L124tQGhx73svxivpMnMHZlmlyT86xmyHBIY Ld59QgRv6vKG72rLSrHSZa+Lb1uFh7kHuROm6DO7xLgjxr18AweT9fEryoLYEfqJ ApBcw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=SL09bhhgt9mSqHG6ci7Ol9syNLsqjHYgcmE0eyeYr 7c=; b=NkaN+3nLrBuKdhQBkhk0f4US7G5JMeE1AGe9bpyk4+IB+4YJOfkyzHub7 Tf9OhIRB3O+5KMA012ZYuVzpTRuSsAhcXi2bakQ8r/cXzjGEHJ1O3KtumTSWqIvu Fy2B8ErEDKZQ11kMYx/w0dhArnhz6rpUbeoRhho05DzcTodC6ROeKTC/G/PDIa53 BJVj57XiaSYs3aS8Z7yQC4hvbu765ztR1OyDspaYkGrrLI/alDsxZeXxzhwa2Ye3 3RvnsAp93VihcpbnipKct+Pv/Nu8uauWGXjSufZmA0Etuzw7h1Fb03Es+L/Y0H3g ou1eWaTbvHA0Hf4dQWz3QYSdMX57Q==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:QYLIXKFM1nVj7dnBqNjS5YTvoztHhGc2rSWFJu2lhK1krZS-O8t2iA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrieehgdehudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhs rgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuffhomhgrih hnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepudejfedrfeekrdduudejrdejheenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinhenucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:QYLIXFSMupjuCMAlcCSVYPFoktLskVx8EEOhvG3DvWuAEpJ5y4JJeA> <xmx:QYLIXGBB0O6gXnMkFWNY3Gr1DqmhwkcBj5QbDe8uE7slPR605fKAcg> <xmx:QYLIXPiU7yPS38yJbry8Ly3A4qMNRRst4DhIgDJ4twhVn1OEBTcBNg> <xmx:QoLIXN6E8deXNUiPEzC9Pi_PA_5OmDw09kAcO_J9hAaPt9DzZWhSBQ>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro5.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 36FDDE454A; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:13:37 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <155454280808.21871.333722671657907840@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:13:35 -0400
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-core-multipart-ct.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, core@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4D782283-D1F6-42EA-87CD-3A6EF31926ED@cooperw.in>
References: <155454280808.21871.333722671657907840@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/g6BNGtNK-ICBR_PkT8-5DYVvYCc>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-multipart-ct-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:13:51 -0000

Thanks Stewart. I entered a No Objection ballot and referred to your review.

Alissa

> On Apr 6, 2019, at 5:26 AM, Stewart Bryant via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-core-multipart-ct-03
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review Date: 2019-04-06
> IETF LC End Date: 2019-04-08
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:
> 
> Apart from one figure that was difficult to understand and some trivial nits
> this is well written and is ready for publication.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
>         __________       __________       __________
>        |          |     |          |     |          |
>   ---->|   2.05   |---->|  2.05 /  |---->|  4.xx /  |
>        | Pending  |     |   2.03   |     |   5.xx   |
>        |__________|     |__________|     |__________|
>           ^   \ \          ^    \           ^
>            \__/  \          \___/          /
>                   \_______________________/
> 
>                   Figure 2: Sequence of Notifications:
> SB> Not my specialty, but I don't see what message gets sent
> SB> to who in the above and RFC7641 has no similar diagram.
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
>   accompanying it.  In such a case, the sequence in which these occur
>   may not be relevant to the application.  This specification allows to
> SB> typo - word missing
>  indicate that an optional part is not present by substituting a null
>   value for the representation of the part.
> 
> ==========
> 
>   The collection is encoded as a CBOR [RFC7049] array with an even
> SB> CBOR needs expanding on first use (it is not on the well known list)
>   number of elements.
> 
> ==========
> 
>   Person & email address to contact for further information:
>      iesg&ietf.org
> SB> Shouldn't that be iesg@ietf.org?
> 
> ==========
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art