IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Sat, 16 January 2016 03:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE371B369E; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:28:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ve2SadKcgZM6; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:28:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E941B1B3698; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:28:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B6C1C5BCB; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:28:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=1.tigertech; t=1452914925; bh=lDaqb53Uvc9m8ULl6LzDGSiGyvTEKrwE5l6xqzX5YCI=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=VXtqbEMcCFdEY1iE+tYbTtCckBuhmzD2B9zQt0rzz4h6VUY0qEetLyXH+7fNI/eor nDVUiDQQ4E9+VCQj3JVrQU1tiyROa0QDtrQpksqexKufV6Fq2hWFij63h9WZchlss8 2i08DDotDYxj6eWZJJ4IGqjYodKR5W183XECu3/I=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B5551C038B; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:28:45 -0800 (PST)
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
References: <569820FC.7050309@nostrum.com> <56997225.9000405@joelhalpern.com> <D3510C4E-A4AD-40B4-9622-BAD702DF6292@nostrum.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <5699B8B5.3080207@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 22:27:49 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D3510C4E-A4AD-40B4-9622-BAD702DF6292@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/gC9x6N0RWDquAKCsvT9zbA6LB00>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-codec-oggopus.all@ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 03:28:47 -0000

I somehow missed that line (I did go look at the announcement.)  Sorry.

In this case, it seems a bit more extreme than the usual downref.  given 
that it is standardizing the use of this format, it seems to be 
essentially standardizing the document defining the format.

Is the intent of the working group to follow up by moving ogg to 
standards track?

Yours,
Joel

On 1/15/16 10:21 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> The last call announcement included the following  text:
>> Please note that the document makes normative references to RFCs 3533
>> and 4732, which are informational.
>>
> Thanks!
>
> Ben.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 15, 2016, at 4:26 PM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com
> <mailto:jmh@joelhalpern.com>> wrote:
>
>> At the very least, the last call needed to identify the downref to RFC
>> 3533.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email