Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa-10.txt

Thanks for your review, Suresh. I agree with your points. Authors, are you taking this into account?

Jari

On 07 Jan 2015, at 08:10, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
> 
> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before 
> posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa-10.txt
> Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
> Review Date: 2015/01/06
> IESG Telechat date: 2015/01/08
> 
> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but 
> I have some minor issues that the authors may wish to address.
> 
> Section 4.2.1.1:
> This sentence is missing a verb (reach?)
> 
> The exclusion of routers reachable via an ECMP that includes S-E 
> prevents the forwarding subsystem from attempting to <MISSING VERB> a 
> repair endpoint via the failed link S-E.
> 
> Section 4.3:
> 
> The Compute_Neighbor_SPFs() function seems to be missing a check for 
> verifying if the interface is not the failed interface. I think the 
> following check should be added.
> 
> if (intf != fail_intf)
> 
> Thanks
> Suresh
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa-10.txt

Attachment: signature.asc